@ProfRob's answer to Neutron star accurate visualization ends with:

...How their temperatures evolve after this is highly uncertain and none have been observed. The problem is that neutron stars have a very small heat capacity. They cool easily, but they can also be reheated easily by ohmic dissipation of their strong magnetic fields or accretion from the interstellar medium. This the surface temperature of most neutron stars is likely to be much lower than 106 K.

I think of neutron stars as fairly rigid objects with magnetic fields "frozen in" and co-rotating with the object.

Ohmic heating would happen if a current were induced due to a changing magnetic flux. One simple source for this would be a decaying field due to electromagnetic dipole radiation1, but I'm just grasping at straws here; there could be other more complicated mechanisms that are significant, see for example How do neutron stars maintain inhomogeneous surfaces and migrating "hot spots"? (e.g. SGR 1830-0645) So I'd like to ask:

Question: How does a neutron star "reheat" itself by ohmic dissipation of its magnetic field?

1See also Has anyone ever put a magnetic or electrostatic dipole on a rotating shaft, spun it and demonstrated reception of a propagating wave in the far-field?


1 Answer 1


Ohmic heating simply refers to the situation of ohmic losses $(I^2 R)$ caused by the finite conductivity of the neutron star interior combined with the currents responsible for generating their magnetic fields.

The deep interiors of neutron stars are probably superconducting fluids and expel the field to the outer crust (with a depth of $\sim 1$ km), which will have finite conductivity. In the absence of any regeneration mechanisms (i.e. a dynamo), then the currents will slowly dissipate and there will be a heating rate inversely proportional to the crust conductivity (e.g. Miralles et al. 1998).

Because the heat capacity of a neutron star is very low (a property of the degenerate fermion gases in most of its interior), even though the ohmic losses may be small, they can have profound consequences for the late thermal history of the neutron star, maintaining their surface temperatures at perhaps $\sim 10^5$K for $10^8$-$10^9$ years.

  • $\begingroup$ I'll dig in to the paper now, thank you. I see "Additional heating associated with the ohmic dissipation of currents may be one more important effect caused by the magnetic field" (Introduction, 4th paragraph) and am simultaneously informed and confused. Sure current flowing in a resistive loop will dissipate and heat the resistor, but "...caused by the magnetic field" still leaves me scratching my head. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Aug 27, 2022 at 13:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh If the field has a curl it "causes" current to flow. Chicken and egg. The current and field co-exist. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Commented Aug 27, 2022 at 13:34
  • $\begingroup$ A million years ago I sat atop a hill in Colorado where a house was being built next to a well that had been drilled earlier and was supposed to work. The problem was no electricity, so my job was to fix an old gasoline generator. Working in the hot summer sun trying to replace old graphite brush contacts, I pondered how there could be no actual permanent magnets in the generator, and yet it could generate kilowatts of power when spinning. I decided then that magnetic fields were smarter than I was, especially the rotating ones; I would always respect them, but never understand them. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Dec 20, 2022 at 23:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.