The centrifugal pseudo force is a result of the fact that an object traveling with no acceleration in an inertial frame will have acceleration relative to a rotating coordinate system. This acceleration, and hence pseudo force, is entirely due to the coordinate system, and not anything physical acting on the object, so your son will have this pseudo force acting on him regardless of whether he is in physical contact with the wall. If he had thrown a ball "upwards", the ball would have fallen back "down", even though it was not in contact with your son or the wall.
However, the strength of the pseudo force is proportional to the distance from the axis of rotation, so when your son moved away from the wall, he did decrease the force somewhat (and also experience Coriolis force pushing him sideways). This probably wasn't significant, though. For instance, if the ride was 10m across and he moved 1m away from the wall, then he decreased the force by 10%.
Another factor is that the centrifugal pseudo force was in addition to, not a replacement of, gravity. He still had gravity pulling him down, and the reason he didn't fall is that the normal force between him and the wall created friction that was stronger than gravity. If his movements caused him to change the amount of friction, that would theoretically be a mechanism to make him fall.
So as for the question of "Can someone fall in a Gravitron type ride?", I don't know whether any ride is constructed in such a way as to make it possible, but from a physics perspective, it certainly would be possible for a ride to be built in such a way that it is possible. If there was just barely enough friction to keep people in place when they're lying down, and they moved around in such a way as to decrease the friction, they could fall.