1
$\begingroup$

Computing the time evolution of a quantum system described by a time-dependent Hamiltonian, $H(t)$, amounts to constructing the time evolution operator $$U = \mathcal{T} \exp \Biggl( -i \int_{0}^{t} \mathrm{d} \tau \ H(\tau) \Biggr) \ . $$ What if the time-dependence in $H(t)$ can be integrated analytically, e.g., if the Hamiltonian is of the form $$ H(t) = H_1 + t H_2$$ with $H_1, H_2$ time-independent? In that case, can I write the following? $$U = \exp \Bigl( -i (H_1 t + \frac{t^2}{2} H_2) \Bigr)$$

This seems naïve, but take for example the Hamiltonian in this question. Could one not simply compute the $t$-integral over $\sin(\omega_0 t)$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You have to be careful about the expression of $U$. The expression you put down mathematically means \begin{align} U & = \lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty}{\big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}H(t)}\big)\big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}H(t(1-{1 \over n}))}\big)\big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}H(t(1-{2 \over n}))}\big)\cdots \big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}H({t \over n})}\big)} \\ & = \lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty}{\big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}(H_1+t H_2)}\big)\big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}(H_1+t(1-{1 \over n}) H_2)}\big)\big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}(H_1+t(1-{2 \over n}) H_2)}\big)\cdots \big(e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}(H_1+{1 \over n} H_2)}\big)} \\ & = \lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty}{\Pi_{j=1}^{n}{e^{-{i \over \hbar}{t \over n}(H_1+j{t \over n}H_2)}}} \end{align} If you want to integrate over $t$ to get the result you wrote, you will need $[H_1,H_2]=0$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you. I don't exactly understand the origin of this product you wrote down, but I do see now that - even in this simple case - $[H(t_1), H(t_2)] \neq 0$ unless $[H_1, H_2]=0$. So what I wrote down does indeed not hold generally. $\endgroup$
    – Durd3nT
    Commented Aug 16, 2022 at 7:02
  • $\begingroup$ To me, it is easier to physically understand the evolution operator in the expression of limit. Given some wavefunction $|\psi(t=0) \rangle$ at $t=0$ and some $dt \rightarrow 0^+$, the operator $e^{-{i \over \hbar}dtH(dt)}$ acting on $|\psi(t=0) \rangle$ will take the wavefunction to $|\psi(t=dt) \rangle$, so the wavefunction evolves into the one at $t=dt$. In the same way, the application of $e^{-{i \over \hbar}dtH(2dt)}$ on $|\psi(t=dt) \rangle$ will take it to $|\psi(t=2dt) \rangle$. Therefore, a series of applications give us $|\psi(t=t_{end}) \rangle$. $\endgroup$
    – Andy Chen
    Commented Aug 16, 2022 at 7:26
  • $\begingroup$ If you find it hard to understand the notation and equations, try a time-independent Hamiltonian first, and it will make sense in a more evident way for time-dependent ones. $\endgroup$
    – Andy Chen
    Commented Aug 16, 2022 at 7:28
  • $\begingroup$ Just to note here, if you expand the series, you will find it equal to Dyson series, which was mentioned in the link you posted. $\endgroup$
    – Andy Chen
    Commented Aug 16, 2022 at 7:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.