2
$\begingroup$

Let's say I have a uniformly charged wire with some constant linear charge density. Along a line parallel to the $z$-axis and passing through $(0,y,0)$ and asked to find an electric field at a point $(p,q,r)$. Then the vector should be $p \textbf{i} +(q-y)\textbf{j}+r\textbf{k}$. My books say the field has no $z$ component and it takes vector as $p\textbf{i}+(q-y)\textbf{j}$. Can someone explain this?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Simplify the problem considering as infinite straight line with constant linear charge density $\:\lambda\:$ the $\:x-$axis. You have then rotational symmetry with respect to this axis. The method of solution depends on what are you studying : Coulomb Law or Gauss Law. $\endgroup$
    – Frobenius
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 18:30
  • $\begingroup$ Related : Why don't stationary charge feel force from a current carrying wire?, Figure-03. $\endgroup$
    – Frobenius
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 18:32

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

It is a question of symmetry. If the source (charge distribution) is z independent (the same for any z), then the field does not depend on z. It can be mathematically proven, but a simple drawing is sufficient. Sum of two electric fields

Consider two elementary segment of length $ dl_{1}$and$ dl_{2}$. They carry the charge $ dq= \lambda dl_{1}= \lambda dl_{2} $ This charges create at the M two electric fields:$ \overrightarrow{d E_{1} } $ and $ \overrightarrow{d E_{2} } $. The electric field intensity only depends on the charge and distance between source and point of observation. So $d E_{1}=d E_{2}=dE= \frac{dq}{4 \pi \varepsilon _{0} r^{2} }$ At the point of observation, the electric fields add up. The vertical components cancel out and one gets: $ \overrightarrow{dE} =2.cos( \theta )dE \overrightarrow{i} $

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ hi, thanks for explanation. But I didn't get it. Can you explain about the drawing and if you can provide any link to the mathematical proof that will be very useful for me. $\endgroup$
    – Sai
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ I have improved my answer, is it clearer? $\endgroup$
    – Shaktyai
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 19:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.