2
$\begingroup$

While proving the Pauli Exclusion Principle, one has to show that the wave function is antisymmetric for fermionic particles:

$$\Psi(x_1,x_2) = -\Psi(x_2,x_1)$$

Which is typically derived from assuming electrons are indistinguishable so:

$$|\Psi(x_1,x_2)|^2=|\Psi(x_2,x_1)|^2$$

Which has 2 cases:

$$\Psi(x_1,x_2) = -\Psi(x_2,x_1)$$ For fermionic particles obeying Pauli's Exclusion Principle and:

$$\Psi(x_1,x_2) = \Psi(x_2,x_1)$$

For bosonic particles which do not obey it.

What about other solutions like:

$$\Psi(x_1,x_2) = e^{i\phi}\Psi(x_2,x_1)$$

What happens to them?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I don't know much about it but you may be interested in this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anyon $\endgroup$
    – Rob Tan
    Commented Aug 12, 2022 at 7:55
  • $\begingroup$ Anyonic states pick up a phase upon permutation; see physics.stackexchange.com/a/705702/36194 $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12, 2022 at 12:23
  • $\begingroup$ See also How are anyons possible? and links therein. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12, 2022 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ $|\Psi(x,y)|= |\Psi(y,x)|$ is not enough: $$\Psi(x,y) = e^{ik(x-y)}\psi(x)\psi(y)$$ for $k\ in \mathbb{R}$ satisfies $$|\Psi(x,y)|= |\Psi(y,x)|$$ but, barring special values of $k$, $$\Psi(x,y) \neq \Psi(y,x)\quad and \quad \Psi(x,y) \neq -\Psi(y,x)\:.$$ You also have to impose that the vector does not change up to a phase for permutations of the arguments. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19 at 11:18

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

For simplicity work with two particles. If they were distinguishable, every physical state could be described as

$|\Psi \rangle = \sum_{ij}c_{ij} |\psi_i\rangle \otimes |\phi_j\rangle \in H_1\otimes H_2$

with $|\psi_i\rangle, |\phi_j \rangle $ in $H_1, H_2$ one-particle basis state vectors respectively. Now the exchange operator $\hat{P}$ is defined by acting on direct product states as

$\hat{P}( |\psi\rangle \otimes |\phi \rangle) = |\phi\rangle \otimes |\psi \rangle $

Now consider again general states $|\Psi\rangle \in H_1 \otimes H_1$ where now the particles are identical and indistinguishable. This implies that of all the states in $H_1^{\otimes 2}$ the only physical ones are those, that gain only an overall phase factor by $\hat{P}$, i.e.

$\hat{P}|\Psi\rangle=\sum_{ij}c_{ij}|\phi_j\rangle \otimes |\psi_i\rangle = e^{i\theta} |\Psi\rangle \Leftrightarrow |\Psi\rangle \text{is physical} $

since $|\Psi\rangle$ and $e^{i\theta}|\Psi\rangle$ correspond to the same physical state. Thus the physical states are those that are eigenstates of $\hat{P}$. Since $\hat{P}^2 = \mathbb{1}$ for eigenstates $|\Psi\rangle$

$|\Psi\rangle = \hat{P}^2 |\Psi\rangle = \hat{P} e^{i\theta} |\Psi\rangle = (e^{i\theta})^2 |\Psi\rangle $

the eigenvalues of $\hat{P}$ are $\pm 1$. Thus although the physicality condition for $|\Psi\rangle$ only requires for the wave functions to be related by a phase, the fact that the states and thus wave functions need to be eigenvectors of the exchange operator forces the eigenvalues to be $\pm 1$. So for wave functions

$\Psi(x_1,x_2) = \langle x_1,x_2 |\Psi \rangle = \langle x_2,x_1| \hat{P} |\Psi\rangle =(\pm1) \langle x_2,x_1|\Psi \rangle = (\pm1)\Psi(x_2,x_1)$

where in the second step $\hat{P} = \hat{P}^\dagger$ was assumed.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I think Maxwell- Boltzmann particles are neither symmetric nor anti-symmetric. This particular discussion is given in the section-8.1 of the book, 'Fundamentals of Statistical Mechanics' by B.B.Laud.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ This doesn't answer the question. The question is asking about wavefunctions in QM. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ @VincentThacker I might be wrong. But the question is related to particles, which has wavefunction (in case of quantum case). I read in that book ,MB particles is neither symmetric nor anti-symmetric. $\endgroup$
    – Rajesh R
    Commented Jul 20 at 9:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.