If I send an artificial light source’s light through a linear polarizer, and that light reflects off a dielectric surface at a narrow angle, is the polarization angle maintained (in this case its linearity) or is the angle of all the light randomized?
I ask because I am working with cross polarization photography and I am wanting to understand conceptually what I am seeing happen before me.
Under cross polarization lighting emitting from a ring flash mounted around the camera, the object being photographed has mostly diffuse reflections which tells me that the linearly polarized light I am shining on it had to have had its polarization angle randomized or changed in some way otherwise all light would be filtered out prior to hitting my camera sensor.
Since there are no specular highlights visible, but plenty of diffuse reflections, I am left wondering the relationship of specular reflections and polarization.
Via Wikipedia I understand specular reflections as light reflecting along the same angle to the viewer, giving the appearance of increased intensity, as opposed to scattering randomly. However I also read about brewster’s angle which causes reflected light to be horizontally polarized, which we see as glare. Is the glare just a specular reflection and it’s polarization state is irrelevant to our viewing of it sans sunglasses, or is there some inherent relationship between specular reflections and linear polarization?
It’s hard to separate the two concepts while reading existing articles as they’re talking about it from the perspective of filtering linear light, so I appreciate your reading, and my apologies in advance for asking two questions in one.
P.S I read all the similar posts prior to submitting