0
$\begingroup$

I know usually if I have a transformation of phase space $Q(p,q), P(p,q)$ it is defined to be canonical if and only if its Jacobi matrix is part of the Symplectic Group or equivalently $\{Q^{i}, P_j \}= \delta^{i}_j, \{P_{i}, P_j \}=0, \{Q^{i}, Q^{j} \}= 0 $ (please correct me if some of this is wrong).

Now I have to show that if $F$ is a conserved quantity then the Hamiltonian is invariant under the flow:

$$ \psi^{\lambda}(q^{\alpha},p_{\alpha})=((q^{\lambda})^{\alpha}(p,q), (p^{\lambda})_{\alpha}(p,q)) $$ Characterised by:

$$ \frac{d (q^{\lambda})^{\alpha}}{d \lambda}=\frac{\partial F}{\partial p_{\alpha}}, \ \frac{d (p^{\lambda})^{\alpha}}{d \lambda}=-\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_{\alpha}} $$

If $F$ Is conserved we have $\{F,H \}=0$, I could probably somehow use this fact and the definition of canonical via the poisson bracket I stated above, but I don’t know how to deal with this flow thing and how to interpret $\frac{d}{d \lambda} $ in this context, so I‘d be happy if someone you’ll help me out :)

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It follows directly from the poisson bracket relation $\{{F,H}\}=-\{{H,F}\}=0$

This says that $F$ is invariant under the flow of $H$ and $H$ is invariant under the flow of $F$. If you want an explicit calculation then:

$$\dfrac{dH}{d\lambda}=\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial q}\dfrac{dq}{d\lambda}+\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial p}\dfrac{dp}{d\lambda}=\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial q}\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial p}-\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial p}\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial q}= \{{H,F}\}=0$$

Note that $\dfrac{dH}{d\lambda}$ is exactly the rate of change of $H$ along the flow of $F$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That makes sense, thank you! $\endgroup$
    – Henry T.
    Commented Jul 30, 2022 at 16:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.