2
$\begingroup$

In many text book (Ashok Das Quantum Field Theory) $$(\Lambda^T)_\nu{}^\mu=\Lambda^\mu{}_\nu$$ that gives $\Lambda^T$ = $\Lambda^{-1}$, where $\Lambda$ is Lorentz Transformation matrix. However, this is not general definition of transpose where rows and columns are exchanged. ie $\Lambda^i_j = \Lambda^j_i$. Hence element of transpose is not obtained by exchanging the rows and column. It is also given that $det(\Lambda^T) = det(\Lambda)$. However generally this is true when we take transpose (i.e rows and columns atre exchanged which not the case here). Is this just accidental that $det(\Lambda^{-1}) = det(\Lambda)$? or tru for any mixed rank tensor.

$\endgroup$
3

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

The correct index structure of the matrices are $\Lambda^\mu{}_\nu$, $(\Lambda^{-1})^\mu{}_\nu$ and $(\Lambda^T)_\mu{}^\nu$ and the correct formulas are $$ \Lambda^\nu{}_\mu = (\Lambda^T)_\mu{}^\nu = (\Lambda^{-1})_\mu{}^\nu. $$ The last equality does NOT imply that in matrix notation $\Lambda^T = \Lambda^{-1}$ because their index structures are different. Instead, we should write $$ (\Lambda^T)_\mu{}^\nu = (\Lambda^{-1})_\mu{}^\nu = \eta_{\mu\rho} \eta^{\nu\sigma}(\Lambda^{-1})^\rho{}_\sigma . $$ We can now employ matrix notation and write $$ \Lambda^T = \eta \Lambda^{-1} \eta^{-1} = \eta \Lambda^{-1} \eta . $$ We can now take the determinant on both sides and we find $$ \det ( \Lambda^T ) = \det(\eta) \det(\Lambda^{-1}) \det(\eta^{-1}) \quad \implies \quad \det \Lambda = \det ( \Lambda^{-1}) . $$

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't$$\forall\mu:\forall\nu:(\Lambda^T)_\mu{}^\nu = (\Lambda^{-1})_\mu{}^\nu$$mean that $\Lambda^T = \Lambda^{-1}$? $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Jul 19, 2022 at 10:25
  • $\begingroup$ No, because $\Lambda^{-1}$ and$\Lambda^T$ have different intrinsic index structures. $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Jul 19, 2022 at 10:27
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please explain what you mean by different index structures? $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Jul 19, 2022 at 10:28
  • $\begingroup$ I mentioned it in the first line but let me elaborate. The matrices $\Lambda$ and $\Lambda^{-1}$ naturally have its first index up and second index down whereas $\Lambda^T$ has its first index down and second one up. So when I write $\Lambda_\mu{}^\nu$ that does NOT represent a Lorentz matrix because its first index is NOT up and second one is NOT down. We must instead use the metric $\eta_{\mu\nu}$ to raise/lower indices to bring it into proper form (1/2) $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Jul 19, 2022 at 10:48
  • $\begingroup$ so we can write $\Lambda_\mu{}^\nu = \eta_{\mu\rho} \eta^{\nu\sigma} \Lambda^\rho{}_\sigma$ and now the indices on $\Lambda$ has the right form. The same thing applies to $\Lambda^{-1}$ as I've done in the answer (2/2). $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Jul 19, 2022 at 10:49
1
$\begingroup$

If $\Lambda$ is a Lorentz matrix, then its inverse is $$\Lambda^{-1}= \eta \Lambda^t \eta$$ where the transposed matrix has here the standard meaning and $\eta= diag(-1,1,1,1)$. Taking the determinant on both sides, it holds, $\det \Lambda^{-1} = \det\Lambda^{t} (= \det \Lambda)$ because $\det\eta=-1$. This fact is false in general but it is true for the elements of some matrix group like $O(n)$ and $Sp(n,R)$ in addition to the Lorentz group.

I finally stress that some groups of physical interest are such that the determinant of their matrices is $1$ by definition (think of the group of proper rotation or the special Lorentz group). In that case, the identity we are discussing is obvious since $\det A = \det A^{t}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.