0
$\begingroup$

From the Minkowski metric, it is almost straightforward to change coordinates and pass to Rindler metric $$ ds^2 = e^{2a\xi}(-d\tau^2 + d\xi^2) + dy^2 + dz^2 $$
given the transformation law $$ t = \frac{1}{a}e^{a\xi}\sinh{a\tau} $$ $$ x = \frac{1}{a}e^{a\xi}\cosh{a\tau} $$ At any fixed $\xi$, let's say $\xi = 0$, these coordinates represent the frame of an uniformly accelerated observer, with acceleration pointing in the x-direction. The question is how can i find a "polar" or rather "spherical" version of the Rindler coordinates describing the frame of an observer accelerating in the radial direction of a $(t,r,\theta,\phi)$ coordinate system? Writing Minkowski in spherical coordinates is very simple, but it is not trivial to make the same change for Rindler, due to this radial acceleration vs x-acceleration question.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is no such thing as the radial direction. Can you clarify what you mean? Personally I think you should be looking at cylindrical coordinates. Spherical coordinates don’t make sense as there isn’t any spherical symmetry even approximately $\endgroup$
    – Dale
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 12:25

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If I understand correctly, let $(t,r,\theta,\phi)$ be the spherical coordinates entered about an arbitrary origin of an inertial frame, you want a new coordinate system $(\tau,\rho,\theta,\phi)$ such that at fixed $\rho_0,\theta_0,\phi_0$, the worldline parametrised by $\tau$ is the one of an accelerating observer at proper rate $a$ in the radial direction with $\tau$ their proper time. For $\rho$, the natural parametrisation would be the point of closest approach, but to keep your approach, I'll take a normalised log of the distance of closest approach.

You just need to calculate position of these accelerating observers: $$ t = \frac{1}{a}e^{a\rho_0}\sinh(a\tau) \\ r = \frac{1}{a}e^{a\rho_0}\cosh(a\tau) \\ \theta = \theta_0 \\ \phi = \phi_0 \\ $$ which gives you your coordinate change. Plugging it into the metric: $$ ds^2=-dt^2+dr^2+r^2d\theta^2+r^2\sin^2\theta d\phi\\ =-e^{2a\rho}d\tau^2+e^{2a\rho}d\rho^2+\left(\frac{1}{a}e^{a\rho}\cosh(a\tau)\right)^2d\theta^2+\left(\frac{1}{a}e^{a\rho}\cosh(a\tau)\right)^2\sin^2\theta d\phi^2 $$

Taking instead the distance of closest approach, which is physically more transparent and the analogy between Rindler coordinates and polar coordinates is made more apparent, your original formulas become: $$ \tilde \xi = \frac{1}{a}e^{a\xi}\\ t = \tilde \xi\sinh(a\tau) \\ x = \tilde \xi\cosh(a\tau) \\ ds^2 = -(a\tilde \xi)^2d\tau^2+d\tilde\xi^2+dy^2+dz^2 $$

so the new formulas become: $$ \tilde \rho = \frac{1}{a}e^{a\rho}\\ ds^2=-(a\tilde\rho)^2d\tau^2+d\rho^2+\tilde \rho^2\cosh^2(a\tau)d\theta^2+\tilde\rho^2\cosh^2(a\tau)\sin^2\theta d\phi^2 $$

Hope this helps.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.