2
$\begingroup$

In the following comment and references, it is mentioned that gravity can be understood as yang mills squared. What is the Lagrangian of a Yang Mills squared theory? Can anyone provide a quick primer?


In this comment:

Why are string theorist so indifferent to the gauge structure of gravity?

Then in these references:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.08267

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTUQw2wxck8

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See also here. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jun 26 at 9:33

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$
  1. The statement $$ \text{(super) gravity} = [\text{(super) Yang-Mills]}^2 $$ is the punch line of the Bern-Carrasco-Johansson (BCJ) colour-kinematic duality conjecture that the perturbative on-shell scattering amplitudes for (super) gravity are the double-copy of gluon scattering amplitudes in (super) Yang-Mills theory.

  2. Refs. 1-2 are some recent work on implementing manifest BCJ colour-kinematic duality at the level of the off-shell action/Lagrangian, cf. OP's title question.

References:

  1. L. Borsten, B. Jurco, H. Kim, T. Macrelli, C. Saemann & M. Wolf, BRST-Lagrangian Double Copy of Yang-Mills Theory, arXiv:2007.13803.

  2. L. Borsten, B. Jurco, H. Kim, T. Macrelli, C. Saemann & M. Wolf, Double Copy from Homotopy Algebras, arXiv:2102.11390.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. In the following reference ift.uni.wroc.pl/~mborn35/files/proc/Krasnov.pdf page 23. The author mentions this Lagrangian as a "double yang-mills" version of gravity: $ S=\int (\operatorname{Tr} \sqrt{F \wedge F})^2$, but does not provide a reference. Can you shed more light on this Lagrangian or know of a link where I can read more about it? $\endgroup$
    – Anon21
    Jun 30 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ FWIW, Krasnov's talk seems based on his work: arxiv.org/abs/1503.08640 , arxiv.org/abs/1406.7159 , and a Plebanski-like action. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Jun 30 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ Is the Lagrangian of a double copy Yang mills $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{\text{copy 1}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{copy 2}}$ or $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{\text{copy 1}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{copy 2}}$? $\endgroup$
    – Anon21
    Jul 7 at 20:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.