10
$\begingroup$

For a 1D particle in a box, energy levels are exactly proportional to $n^2$.

For the harmonic oscillator, $E_n\sim n$. And for a particle in an $|x|^\alpha$ potential, the energies are $\sim n^\beta$ with $\beta <2$ from the WKB approximation.

I also vaguely recall that the eigenvalues for a regular Sturm-Liouville problem are $\sim n^2$.

All of this suggests that the eigenvalues cannot rise faster than $n^2$. Is my intuition correct here?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Are you restricting attention to 1D potentials? $\endgroup$ Jun 23 at 12:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not necessarily. $\endgroup$
    – FusRoDah
    Jun 23 at 13:07
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @MariusLadegårdMeyer, I think OP means the principal quantum number "n" $\endgroup$
    – VinalV
    Jun 23 at 13:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ possibly interesting: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weyl_law $\endgroup$ Jun 24 at 14:15

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$
  1. In this answer we generalize OP's 1D semiclassical WKB estimate for a power law potential $\Phi(x) \propto |x|^{\alpha}$ to an arbitrary potential $\Phi(x)$. If $\ell(V)$ denotes the accessible length function at potential energy-level $V$, then the number of bound states $N(E)$ below energy-level $E$ is $$ N(E) ~\approx ~\frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} \int_{V_0}^E \frac{\ell(V)~dV}{\sqrt{E-V}},\tag{2} $$ cf. my Phys.SE answer here. Since $V\mapsto \ell(V)$ is a monotonically (weakly) increasing non-negative function, we can pick a potential energy-level $V_1>V_0$ such that $$ N(E) ~\gtrsim~\frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} \int_{V_1}^E \frac{\ell(V_1)~dV}{\sqrt{E-V}} ~=~\frac{2\sqrt{2m}}{h} \ell(V_1)\sqrt{E-V_1},$$ i.e. the number of bound states $N(E)$ grows at least as fast as $\sqrt{|E|}$.

    Or equivalently: $E_n$ grows no faster than $n^2$.

  2. On the other hand, from regular Sturm-Liouville theory, it is known that the resolvent is a compact operator, which implies that $$\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}|E_n|^{-2}~<~\infty$$ is convergent, and which shows that $E_n$ must grow faster than $\sqrt{n}$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

It sort of depends on what restrictions you impose on $H$.

If we let $|n\rangle$ be the eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator, then you can surely define $$ H:=\sum_{n\ge0}E_n|n\rangle\langle n| $$ where $E_n$ is any function you want, say $E_n=n^3$. This Hamiltonian has eigenvalues $E_n$ and eigenfunctions $\psi_n(x)\sim H_n(x)e^{-x^2}$, which are perfectly well-defined wave-functions.

You may even be able to write the above as $P^2+V(x)$ for some nasty $V(x)$, although I haven't tried.

So unless you specify which precise type of Hamiltonian you want, the answer is that you can have any spectrum you want.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The WKB result from @Qmechanic would seem to indicate that there might be an impediment to realizing this Hamiltonian in the form $P^2 + V$. $\endgroup$ Jun 24 at 16:58
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelSeifert QM's answer applies to sufficiently nice $V$. Although I don't have any particularly convincing argument, I suspect that it is still possible with a sufficiently nasty $V$. $\endgroup$ Jun 24 at 22:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.