In Shankar's QM book Chapter 10 pg. 274, it was said that quantum mechanically, the separability of the hamiltonian $$H=H_1(x_1, p_1)+H_2(x_2,p_2)$$ leads to the factorization of the wave function: $$\psi(x_1,x_2)=\psi_1(x_1)\psi_2(x_2).$$

How can this be shown to be true?

I know that for a separable Hamiltonian, the energy eigenvalue equation $$(\hat{H_1}+\hat{H_2})\psi_E(x_1,x_2)=E\psi_E(x_1,x_2)$$ gives energy solutions which are separable: $$\psi_E(x_1,x_2)=\psi_{E_1}(x_1)\psi_{E_2}(x_2).$$

The general wavefunction will hence be a superposition of the separable energy eigenfunctions $\psi_E$:


How do I proceed to show that the above expression can be written as


  • $\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? Separable Hamiltonian systems in quantum mechanics $\endgroup$
    – Niall
    Jun 23 at 9:55
  • $\begingroup$ The answers under that post do not show that the eigenstates are factorizable, only that they are common eigenstates of $H_1(x_1,p_1)$ and $H_2(x_2,p_2)$ $\endgroup$ Jun 23 at 9:59
  • $\begingroup$ I think Shankar was being vague and what he really meant was that the energy eigenfunctions are separable. In a few lines later, he wrote that symmetrical states like $|a\rangle \otimes |b\rangle + |b\rangle \otimes |a\rangle$ in general fails to be factorized. $\endgroup$
    – TaeNyFan
    Jun 23 at 11:01

1 Answer 1


I think your interpretation of Shankar's statement is too strong and that cannot be true. Shankar's statement is that separable states make up a complete eigenbasis of the Hamiltonian $H$. Your interpretation is that every eigenstate of $H$ is a separable state. The two statements are equivalent only if the spectrum of $H$ is non-degenerate. Otherwise, you are free to add up two separable eigenstates with the same energy to make up an entangled eigenstate, which cannot be separable in any way. (Quantum entanglement is a basis-independent statement. There is no way to separate an entangled state)

Actually a simpler way to see this is to consider the trivial case $H_1=H_2=0$. Then any state, either entangled or unentangled, is an eigenstate. However, it is still possible to find a complete basis of $H=0$ which only consists of unentangled state (that is, the total Hilbert space is a tensor product of the two Hilbert spaces).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.