0
$\begingroup$

I know that standard notation can be changed into scientific notation and vice versa while preserving the number of significant figures, like $100=1\times10^2$ which has one significant figure, or $100.=1.00\times10^2$ has three sig figs.

Now this one seems problematic: $1.0\times10^2$ has two sig figs. What is the standard notation of $1.0\times10^2$ with two sig figs?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ "100" is ambiguous. THAT is why you should use scientific notation to indicate the significant figures in a number like this. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 16, 2022 at 20:45
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Significant figures are a waste of time. One should just explicitly specify the magnitude of errors in all uncertain quantities. $\endgroup$
    – Jagerber48
    Commented Jun 16, 2022 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ More on significant figures. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Jun 18, 2022 at 4:15

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Now this one seems problematic: $1.0\times10^2$ has two sig figs. What is the standard notation of $1.0\times10^2$ with two sig figs?

Yes, it is problematic. Significant figures are not actually used by practicing scientists. They are just a crutch for students to use while they are learning other more important things.

Professional scientists today will simply report the actual uncertainty of any measurement. So we would write something like “$100$ with a standard uncertainty of $3$” or “$100\pm 3$” or “$100(3)$”. All of these make the situation clear and unambiguous. It also allows much more precise statements of the uncertainty.

Whether you use standard, scientific, or engineering notation is not an issue.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.