There seem to be two definitions for the angular momentum of a particle with respect to a moving point.

See the figure below. Let $O$ be the origin of a coordinate system in an inertial frame. Let $Q$ be a point moving with respect to $O$. Let $K$ be the position of the particle. $\vec r_Q $ is the vector from $O$ to $Q$, $\vec r_K$ is the vector from $O$ to $K$, and $\vec r_{KQ} = \vec r_K - \vec r_Q$ is the vector from $Q$ to $K$. The velocity of $K$ in the inertial frame is $\vec v_K$, the velocity of Q in the inertial frame is $\vec v_Q$, and the velocity of $K$ with respect to $Q$ is $\vec v_ {KQ} = \vec v_ K - \vec v_Q$. Some physics texts seem to define the angular momentum of $K$ with respect to $Q$, $\vec L_{KQ}$, as $$(1) \vec L_{KQ} = m[(\vec r_K - \vec r_Q) \times (\vec v_K - \vec v_Q)]$$ For example, see Symon, Mechanics

Engineering texts seem to use the definition $$(2) \vec L_{KQ} = m[(\vec r_K - \vec r_Q) \times \vec v_K] $$ For example, see the following text by Kochmann online: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/mavt/mechanical-systems/mm-dam/documents/Notes/Dynamics_LectureNotes.pdf.

Updated Information

I recently found an MIT physics class lecture online that uses relationship (2). See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHedXxUO-Bg. The professor specifically emphasizes that for $\vec L_{KQ} = (\vec r_K - \vec r_Q) \times m\vec p$ where $\vec p$ is the linear momentum of the particle, the momentum must be evaluated using the velocity of $K$ with respect to $O$, that is $\vec p = m\vec v_K$.

Is relationship (1) ever used in practice?

enter image description here



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.