I was wondering if someone could provide me the name of the following equation

$$\square \varphi - \tilde{m}^2 \varphi = 0,$$

where $\square := \partial_t^2 - \nabla^2$. I am specifically seeking information on the physical interpretation of this equation. This comes from the minimisation of the following action

$$S = \int \frac{1}{2} (\partial_t \varphi)^{2} - \frac{1}{2} (\delta^{ij} \partial_i \varphi \partial_j \varphi) + \frac{1}{2} \tilde{m}^{2} \varphi^{2} \, dx \, dt$$

Clearly, it is similar in form to the Klein-Gordon equation, but with an imaginary mass $m \to i \tilde{m}$. I have read that the quartic potential for the Klein-Gordon equation with this imaginary mass

$$V(\varphi) = -\frac{1}{2} \tilde{m}^2 \varphi^2 + \frac{1}{2} \lambda \varphi^4$$

leads to spontaneous symmetry breaking, as referenced in this PBS spacetime video (starting at 10:29), but am not sure what is supposed to be happening when $\lambda = 0$.

I apologise if this question is not clear enough. I don't know enough about the equation above to know where to look for such information, nor the kinds of questions that I really want to ask about it, and this makes it rather difficult to ask a good question as per the site requirements.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Always fun when questions end up being about the site logo $\endgroup$
    – jacob1729
    Jun 12, 2022 at 22:24

1 Answer 1


For what it's worth, a scalar field with an imaginary mass is called a tachyonic field. It should be stressed that it is not superluminous, cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post, but since the "wrong-sign" quadratic potential by itself is unstable, it must be accompanied with a higher-order stable potential, typically a $\phi^4$ potential. The Higgs field is an example.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the response, I really appreciate it. I believe this makes a lot of sense in the context the equation is found; briefly, the field $\varphi$ is the solution to a particular system in a marginally stable state, and hence the 'wrong sign' quadratic potential is necessary to describe the spontaneous symmetry breaking from marginal stability to instability (this is how I have interpreted it anyway). Thanks again for your help. $\endgroup$ Jun 12, 2022 at 10:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.