0
$\begingroup$

In Peskin&Schroeder chapter 16.3 we are showing how ghosts ensure unitarity in non-Abelian theories. My problem comes when I try to calculate a specific amplitude. In equation 16.37 we have the term $$ \frac{1}{2}(i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu})g_{\mu\rho}g_{\nu\sigma}(i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}) $$ where the amplitude $i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}$ corresponds to the annihillation of a fermion=anti-fermion pair to a pair of gauge bosons while the amplitude $i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}$ corresponds to the creation of a fermion-anti-fermion pair from a gauge boson pair. My problem is in the calculation of the second interation.

Before going there let me explain that the above expression is within a phasespace integral and using the completeness relation for the metrics we get $$ i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}\left(\epsilon^{-*}_\mu\epsilon^+_\rho+\epsilon^{+*}_\mu\epsilon^-_\rho-\sum_{i=1}^2\epsilon^T_{i\mu}\epsilon_{i\rho}^{*T}\right)\left(\epsilon^{-*}_\nu\epsilon_\sigma^{+}+\epsilon^{+*}_\nu\epsilon_\sigma^{-}-\sum_{i=1}^2\epsilon_{i\nu}^T\epsilon_{i\sigma}^{*T}\right)i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma} \tag{1} $$ where most of the terms are zero and the only contributions we have are $$ i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}\epsilon^{-*}_\mu\epsilon_\nu^{+*}\epsilon^+_\rho\epsilon^-_\sigma i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}+i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}\epsilon_\mu^{+*}\epsilon_\nu^{-*}\epsilon_\rho^-\epsilon_\sigma^+ i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}=\\ \left(i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}\epsilon^{-*}_\mu(k_1)\epsilon^{+*}_\nu(k_2)\right)\left(i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}\epsilon^+_\rho(k_1)\epsilon^-_\sigma(k_2)\right)+\left(i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}\epsilon^{+*}_\mu(k_1)\epsilon^{-*}_\nu(k_2)\right)\left(i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}\epsilon^-_\rho(k_1)\epsilon^+_\sigma(k_2)\right) $$ where we omit contributions of the transverse polarization vectors because they will vanish in our calculation of the Ward Identity.

Now I haven't found anywhere a clear calculation of the amplitude $i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}$ so I tried to go through it on my own. The calculation is identical to $i\mathcal{M}^{\mu\nu}$ but there is an extra negative sign which I don't understand where it comes from.

The expression I got is $$ i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}\epsilon_\sigma(k_2)k_{1\rho}=g^2\bar{u}(p')\gamma_\lambda t^cv(p_+')\frac{1}{k_3^2}f^{abc}\epsilon_\sigma(k_2)k_2^\sigma k_2^\lambda $$ Then we recall we only use the forward/backward polarisation vectors, and using $$ \epsilon_\rho^+(k_1)=\frac{k_{1\rho}}{\sqrt{2}|\vec{k_1}|}\Rightarrow k_{1\rho}=\sqrt{2}|\vec{k_1}|\epsilon_\rho^+(k_1)\\ \epsilon^-_\sigma(k_2)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}|\vec{k_2}|}(k_2^0,-\vec{k_2})\Rightarrow \epsilon^-_\sigma(k_2)k_2^\sigma=\sqrt{2}|\vec{k_2}| $$

we have $$ \begin{aligned}i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}\epsilon^-_\sigma(k_2)k_{1\rho}&=g^2\bar{u}(p')\gamma_\lambda t^cv(p_+')\frac{1}{k_3^2}f^{abc}\epsilon^-_\sigma(k_2)k_2^\sigma k_2^\lambda\Rightarrow\\ i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}\epsilon_\sigma^-(k_2)\sqrt{2}|\vec{k_1}|\epsilon_\rho^+(k_1)&=g^2\bar{u}(p')\gamma_\lambda t^cv(p_+')\frac{1}{k_3^2}f^{abc}\sqrt{2}|\vec{k_2}| k_2^\lambda\Rightarrow\\ i\mathcal{M}'^{\rho\sigma}\epsilon^+_\rho(k_1)\epsilon_\sigma^-(k_2)&=g^2\bar{u}(p')\gamma_\lambda t^c v(p'_+)\frac{1}{k_3^2}f^{abc}\frac{|\vec{k_2}|}{|\vec{k_1}|}k_2^\lambda \end{aligned} $$ This quantity should be negative, but I don't understand where we gain that extra minus sign.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

This is what I have in my notes. I hope it is useful. One can work out the non-transverse part of (1) as \begin{align} &\frac{1}{2}\left( i g \bar{v} (p_2)\gamma_\mu t^c u (p_1)\frac{-i}{(k_1+k_2)^2}g f^{abc} k_2^\mu \right) \times \left( i g \bar{u} (p_1)\gamma_\rho t^d v (p_2)\frac{-i}{(k_1+k_2)^2}g f^{abd} \big(- k_1^\rho \big) \right) \nonumber\\ & + (k_1 \longleftrightarrow k_2 ) \end{align} It turns out that the first part is anti-symmetric under $k_1 \longleftrightarrow k_2$. To see this first use momentum conservation $k_1+k_2=p_1+p_2$ on \begin{align} \bar{v}(p_2)\gamma_\mu (k_1+k_2)^\mu u(p) & = \bar{v}(p_2)\gamma_\mu (p_1+p_2)^\mu u(p) = \bar{v}(p_2) (\not{\!p}_1+\not{\!p}_2) u(p) \nonumber\\ &= \bar{v}(p_2) (\not{\!p}_2+m +\not{p}_1-m) u(p) =0 \end{align} We thus have $\bar{v}(p_2)\gamma_\mu k_1^\mu u(p) = - \bar{v}(p_2)\gamma_\mu k_2^\mu u(p)$ and can thus interchange $k_1$ and $k_2$ in the first factor of the first line if we include a minus sign. We have the same result for the second factor, and so overall the first line is invariant under the change of $k_1$ and $k_2$. So we find the result \begin{align} - \left( i g \bar{v} (p_2)\gamma_\mu t^c u (p_1)\frac{-i}{(k_1+k_2)^2}g f^{abc} k_2^\mu \right) \left( i g \bar{u} (p_1)\gamma_\rho t^d v (p_2)\frac{-i}{(k_1+k_2)^2}g f^{abd} k_1^\rho \right) \end{align}

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I am actually using your notes to understand a lot of the parts in the subject so thank you for sharing them with the world! My problem is that when I try and compute the second parenthesis you have where you have the $-k_1^\rho$ term, I actually get $+k_1^\rho$ but it is definitely wrong. I think I am making a fatal mistake with the Feynman diagrams but I just can't spot it! The same happens with the ghost diagrams. $\endgroup$ Jun 5, 2022 at 13:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.