-1
$\begingroup$

Using a MCMC code that implements the Brans-Dicke's model with all the modified equations of field.

Finally, I get this curve that represents the scale factor versus cosmic time:

enter image description here

with the following expression:

enter image description here

and we get finally:

enter image description here

What should I do for priors in my MCMC code to produce an older universe since on this attached ?, the universe is young compared to the LCDM model.

Have I got to play with $tc$ or constants $C1$ and $C2$ in this expression :

C1 and C2

?

All I want is to have an older universe (at least -10 Gy from the present).

Any remark/track/clue are welcome.

Edit:

  1. Some precisions for @buzz about the first answer that I got.

Yes, $\Omega_k\equiv\Omega_K$ and $\Omega_{de}=\Omega_{\Lambda}$ ($de$ for Dark Energy).

You are right when you say that I didn't take into account of radiation $\Omega_{r}$. Actually, if I include it in the computation of $\Omega_k=1-\Omega_{m}-\Omega_{\Lambda}-\Omega_{r}, this doesn't seem to have an impact on the young age of universe that I get by computing scale factor $a(t)$.

In my MCMC code, I have put the following priors on cosmological parameters :

variables = {$Omega_m$,\Omega_k,H0,\Phi_0,d\Phi_0,\Omega_{BD}};
priors={{0.27,0.33},{-0.01,0.01}, {64,76}, {0,4}, {0., 0.01}, {0,1000}};

I get the follwing estimations after an MCMC run :

{Ωm, Ωk, Ωde, H0, ϕ0, dϕ0, ωBD, tc} -> {0.270023, 0.00311401, 0.726863, 64.0442, 2.66395, 0.000218655, 907.375, 0.449043}
  1. Intuitively, by making decrease the Hubble constant $H_0$ (let say $H_0=60$, I make universe older with the following curve :

enter image description here

I manage to reach over the 8 Gyr instead of 6 in my first attempt.

This coould be explained by the fact that age of universe is classical kind of :

$t_{age}=\dfrac{1}{H_0}$ , so if I take a lower $H_0$, I will have an older universe.

But the problem is that $H_0$ is larger (with Planck, $H_0=67 km/s/Mpc$ and with Riess, $H0=72 km/s/Mpc$).

How to find a way into Brans-Dicke's model to compensate the low estimation of $H_0=64$ that I get with MCMC by another parameter (Maybe "$t_c$" or $\omega_{BD}$) ? The ideal would be to have an estimation close to Planck and have in the same time an older universe

Edit 2:

I have got an interesting result (by playing on H0, omega_BD, phi0 and dphi0) :

$$ \Omega_r=10^{-4};\\ \Omega_m=0.270023;\\ \Omega_{de}=\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.726863;\\ \Omega_k=1.0-\Omega_m-\Omega_{de}-\Omega_r;\\ H0=67;\\ \Phi_0=0.66395\\ tc=0.0001;\\ $$

scale factor curve

you can see a first part with decellerated expansion and after an accelerated expansion. Now, I have to make universe older (only 4 Gyrs on my figure) but I don't know how to make it older :

I must notify this result is a fine-tuned result by playing with all parameters

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I have been working on a similar problem.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/seeking-reference-for-math-related-to-the-age-of-recombination.1015331/

I would like to help your problem, but I do not understand your symbols.

I get Ω_m and H_0, but I'm not sure about Ω_de and Ω_k. I guess Ω_de is what I call Ω_Lambda. Regarding Ω_k, this is a more accurate value. See

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Astro/denpar.html

for the value Ω_k = 8.24 x 10^-5. I am also interested where you got

Ω_m = 0.240303

since the value in the reference above is 0.27 .

You seem to ignore Ω_r (radiation density).

You also seem to ignore the Friedmann equation in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann_equations#Detailed_derivation .

If you can clarify my confusion, I will try to help you.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. I have put in Edit morre precisons on what I have done. For the scale factor, I use Runge-Kutta 4 applied on modified Friedmann's equations of Brans-Dicke's models (slightly different from LCDM but implying $\omega_{BD}$ and $\phi$ potential). Best regards $\endgroup$
    – ACat
    May 29 at 5:57
  • $\begingroup$ I apologize @ACat . I looked at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brans%E2%80%93Dicke_theory. I found that I am completely not able to understand the related mathematics. I would appreciate it you posted a comment with references for the values you included in your post: Ω_m = 0.240303, ΩΛ=0.726863, Ωr=10−4. Also, the equation t = 1/H_0 is wrong. The correct equation is derived from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann_equations#Detailed_derivation $\endgroup$
    – Buzz
    May 30 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ The correct equation under the above heading is the integral (it has the form below). t H_0 = INTEGRAL(0,a) SQRT("sum of four Omega terms") da. $\endgroup$
    – Buzz
    May 30 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ The SQRT should be 1/SQRT. $\endgroup$
    – Buzz
    May 30 at 23:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.