Since a star heats up when it radiates more heat (via gravitational compression), and since that's also how protostars turn into stars, I was wondering what are the chances of Jupiter reaching the point where nuclear fusion kicks off within it given that it survived long enough?

  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/776/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    May 14 at 8:05
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Ranjan. Welcome to Phys.SE. What mechanism for gravitational compression do you have in mind? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    May 14 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic: thanks for pointing to the answer. I meant that gravitational compression would cause the materials in the star to heat up... $\endgroup$
    – Ranjan
    May 14 at 8:13

3 Answers 3


The smallest objects (given an elemental abundance mixture appropriate to a giant planet like Jupiter) that can attain hot enough interiors to ignite a sustained thermonuclear reaction are about 13 times that of Jupiter. The fusion reaction in question is that of deuterium, which burns at lower temperatures than "normal" hydrogen. The equivalent mass for hydrogen (protium) ignition is about 75 times the mass of Jupiter.

Jupiter is therefore nowhere near massive enough to instigate nuclear fusion reactions in its interior.

The question arises - why cannot Jupiter simply contract until its core becomes hot enough to ignite these reactions? The virial theorem tells us that any contraction will be associated with half the gravitational potential energy being radiated away and half being used to heat the interior.

The answer is degeneracy pressure. The electrons in Jupiter's deep interior are dense enough to form an increasingly degenerate Fermi gas. This Fermi gas exerts a pressure that is almost independent of the temperature. This means that as Jupiter radiates away its interior heat, the pressure hardly diminishes and as a result any contraction of Jupiter is rather small and slow and will not lead to any significant temperature increase. Ultimately, Jupiter will attain a "zero temperature" configuration that is not much smaller than it is today and could cool at nearly constant radius. At no point will it ever become hot enough to ignite nuclear fusion. This is the basic reason for the mass limits quoted above.

I found the following plot in Fortney et al. (2006) which shows this general behaviour. These are model calculations of the evolution of radius (in Jupiter radii) for a Jupiter-mass planet either with (dashed lines) or without (solid lines) a solid core. The different colours represent different distances from the parent star (to account for the effects of insolation). The appropriate curve for Jupiter is between the 1 au and 9.5 au curves. What this shows is that the rate at which the radius gets smaller decreases with time (note the time axis is logarithmic).

Fortney et al. planetary radius

  • $\begingroup$ What is on the y-axis? What is "R"? $\endgroup$ May 15 at 16:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PeterMortensen radius in Jupiter radii $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    May 15 at 17:55

No. It lacks sufficient mass. Stellar ignition requires a mass of 6-8% of 1 solar mass. Or 70-80 times Jupiter's mass


Stellar ignition is a very complex matter since it relies on quantum tunneling.

It is not an on/off state - ie you add one gram and then, boom, it explodes into a star.

The higher density you get, the higher pressure/temperature you have in the core and the more probable the occasional fusion of two atoms is. At some point, it becomes a continuous process and you have a star.

13 times the mass of Jupiter is the limit required for a continuous deuterium-deuterium fusion - this is a brown dwarf.

80 times is what is needed for the real deal (proton-proton reaction).

Jupiter's mass should be enough for deuterium-tritium fusion - the only problem is that these are quite rare and do not last. So there is probably already some fusion in the core.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the new insight! I am really curious. Can you think of a paper or some resource where there more on the deuterium-tritium fusion in Jupiter? $\endgroup$
    – Ranjan
    May 16 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't quantum tunneling a bit of a red herring here? Classical gasses have the same property, where a few collisions have enough energy to react, and as the heat and pressure go up, the energy those reactions produce become sufficient to sustain a continuous reaction, fire, fission or fusion. $\endgroup$
    – prosfilaes
    May 16 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ It is about overcoming the repulsive Coulomb forces. You need more than a simple collision between two protons - you need sufficient kinetic energy for them to come close enough for the strong nuclear force to come into play. The temperature/pressure in the Sun's core is not enough for this - quantum tunneling allows it to happen with a X% probability. Quantum tunneling was a very important discovery that was the final missing element for solving the Sun's puzzle. $\endgroup$
    – mmomtchev
    May 16 at 18:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.