1
$\begingroup$

The free-field KG lagrangian density for complex scalar field is given as $$\hat{\mathcal{L}}_{\text{KG}}=(\partial_\mu\hat{\phi}^\dagger)(\partial^\mu\hat\phi)-m^2\hat{\phi}^\dagger\hat{\phi}$$ By making the minimal substitution $$\partial^\mu\mapsto\hat{D}^\mu=\partial^\mu+iq\hat{A}^\mu$$ we could introduce electromagnetic field into the equation and obtain $$\hat{\mathcal{L}}=\hat{\mathcal{L}}_{\text{KG}}+\hat{\mathcal{L}}_{\text{INT}}$$ The expected results should be $$\hat{\mathcal{L}}_{\text{INT}}=-iq\left(\hat{\phi}^\dagger(\partial^\mu\hat\phi)-(\partial^\mu\hat\phi^\dagger)\hat{\phi}\right)\hat{A}^\mu+q^2\hat{A}^\mu\hat{A}_\mu\hat{\phi}^\dagger\hat{\phi}\tag{1}$$ However, I did the subsitution myself and kept getting $$\hat{\mathcal{L}}_{\text{INT}}=iq\left(\hat{\phi}^\dagger(\partial^\mu\hat\phi)+(\partial^\mu\hat\phi^\dagger)\hat{\phi}\right)\hat{A}^\mu+q^2\hat{A}^\mu\hat{A}_\mu\hat{\phi}^\dagger\hat{\phi}$$ But I could not understand how i got it wrong. Could someone please explain how to get the correct expression equation (1)?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ @FrodCube No they are not. There is a relative sign between the first two terms. That is what he is asking about. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    May 11 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ OP, can you provide me with the textbook/lecture notes you've been using? $\endgroup$ May 11 at 18:00

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The error that you've made is that the factor $(\partial_{\mu} \phi^{\dagger})$ in the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian should be written as $(\partial_{\mu} \phi)^{\dagger}$. This makes a difference, since the hermitian conjugate is applied to the gradient of the field, $\partial_{\mu}\phi$, not $\phi$. Ordinarily, you could get away with your notation, since $(\partial_{\mu}\phi)^{\dagger}=\partial_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger}$. However, since $(D_{\mu}\phi)^{\dagger}=\partial_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger}-iqA_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger} \ne \partial_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger} +iqA_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger} = D_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger}$, you'll get into trouble. In other words, when you make the substitution $\partial_{\mu} \mapsto D_{\mu}$ apply the hermitian conjugate to $D_{\mu}\phi$, not $\phi$.

I hope this clears things up!

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ -1. I don't know where you have seen that $\partial_\mu^\dagger = \partial_\mu$ but it is entirely wrong. Moreover, you completely missed the point of OP, since OP explicitly says that its notation for $+$ is in fact $\ast$, the complex conjugate. Even in the operator formalism, one shouldn't take the hermitian conjugate instead of the complex conjugate. $\endgroup$ May 11 at 7:43
  • $\begingroup$ Hi! Please provide some arguments on why $\partial_{\mu}^{\dagger}=\partial_{\mu}$ is entirely wrong, I would like to learn more about it. $\endgroup$ May 11 at 9:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi, first, sorry if I've been rude. Second, our Klein-Gordon field belongs to $L^2(\mathbb{R}^{1,3})$, so we can define $\langle f | g \rangle = \int d^4x f^\ast g$. So $\langle f | \partial_\mu g \rangle=\langle f |\partial_\mu | g \rangle \stackrel{\text{p.p.}}{=}-\langle \partial_\mu f | g \rangle=- \langle f |\partial_\mu^\dagger | g \rangle $, where $\text{p.p.}$ stands for "integration by part". $\endgroup$ May 11 at 9:41
  • $\begingroup$ Does that mean that $\partial_{\mu}=-\partial_{\mu}^{\dagger}?$ I know nothing about $L^p$ spaces... I will probably make a question about this. $\endgroup$ May 11 at 12:31
  • $\begingroup$ @JeanbaptisteRoux In this case $\partial_\mu = \partial_\mu^\dagger$ because this $\dagger$ refers to the action on the Fock space of the theory, while the derivative acts on the field coordinates. $\endgroup$
    – FrodCube
    May 11 at 16:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.