0
$\begingroup$

I am really confused by a paragraph i am reading about skin depth. It gives the example of a conducting strip with height $a$, length $L$ and thickness $d$.

It states that for a direct current the area for the resistance is $A = ad$ giving $R=\frac{L}{\sigma a}$ where $\sigma$ is conductivty.

Thats easy enough to follow, but then it says for a much higher frequency the skin depth is much smaller than the cross sectional area so the area for the resistance becomes $A = 2a\delta$ where $\delta$ is skin depth. So we get $R = \frac{L}{2\sigma a \delta}$

I am struggling to understand how they got this second area for a higher frequency resistance, its not explained at all. Why $2\delta$, I can't figure it out.

Hope some one is able explain the derivation so I understand what is going on.

Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Since you describe your shape as a “conducting strip,” I am guessing you have the constraint $d \ll a \ll L$, so that the whole strip is shaped like a bookmark or a stick of chewing gum.

In that case the skin effect, which limits the charge flow to within some distance $\delta$ from the conductor’s surface, would contribute cross-sectional area $2a\delta$ from the two long sides, but only a negligible $2d\delta$ from the two short sides.

In cross section, if your “strip” looks like

               width a
-----------------------------------
|                                 | thickness d
-----------------------------------
               area a·d

then when the skin depth becomes shorter than the thickness, the conducting area might become

               width a
=================================== upper: a·𝛿
||                               || thickness d
=================================== lower: a·𝛿
left: d·𝛿                 right: d·𝛿

and so the effective conducting area is $2(a+d)\delta ≈ 2a\delta$.

If your conductor were shaped more like a rod with $a\approx d$ than like a strip with $a\gg d$, you would get to include the skin effect volume on all sides. By using a conducting strip, you keep the total resistance roughly constant while the skin depth is larger than the strip’s thickness, $\delta \gtrsim d$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Is there any chance you can add a visual diagram - I find it a lot easier to understand this topic with visuals. $\endgroup$
    – WDUK
    Commented Apr 29, 2022 at 7:51
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe? I’m not much for computer graphics, but I’ve given it a shot. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Apr 29, 2022 at 9:16
  • $\begingroup$ From your diagram which direction are we assuming the waves propagate ? I assume left to right or right to left. But if so why is there an upper and a lower cross section involved? Same question if its vertical propagation too. Assuming i've understood the diagram correctly. $\endgroup$
    – WDUK
    Commented Apr 29, 2022 at 22:06
  • $\begingroup$ Oh wait, i actually think i understand the diagrams now, its an outer layer around the whole strip that the current is flowing through at high frequency. $\endgroup$
    – WDUK
    Commented Apr 29, 2022 at 22:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, the “long” direction comes out of the page. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Apr 30, 2022 at 3:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.