# On $k$-space density of states and semiclassical transport

I am reading Chapter 12 of Ashcroft and Mermin and I have a great many questions, but one sticks out in particular.

As background, we note that it can be shown quite generally (by applying Born-von Karman boundary conditions to a convenient volume $$V$$) that the "volume per $$k$$-state" in $$k$$-space is (in 3D) $$\mathbf{\Delta k} = V/8\pi^3$$. Thus, taking the very large $$V$$ limit and dividing by $$V$$ we find that the density of $$k$$-states (per unit real space volume) is $$1/8\pi^3$$. Now if I were to multiply this by the real and $$k$$-space volume measures $$d\mathbf{k}d\mathbf{r}$$ and then integrate over an entire primitive cell (leaving only the $$d\mathbf{r}$$ measure behind) then I ought to get the total number of $$k$$-states available (in a given band) at $$\mathbf{r}$$ in the crystal in a volume $$d\mathbf{r}$$. This last point (italicized) is what confuses me. When the original derivation for the allowable k-states proceeded (the standard Bloch theorem proof), we showed that some $$\mathbf{k}$$ (in a given band) indexed a unique electronic state (neglecting spin) throughout the whole crystal, but with the above I seem to have found that all of these $$k$$-states exist at each $$\mathbf{r}$$ in the crystal.

I note further the following: the derivation using the BvK boundary conditions proceeded in some finite volume $$V$$, before letting $$V$$ go to infinity while dividing by $$V$$. We then further assert/assume that all quantities (including $$k$$-space density) per unit volume are the same in the infinite $$V$$ and any finite $$V$$ cases. Thus it follows that we can recover the $$k$$-space density by multiplying the $$k$$-space density per unit volume (found in the infinite $$V$$ limit) by whatever the actual crystal $$V$$ is (actually finite). But here $$d\mathbf{r}$$ is not the entire crystal volume! It seems as though we are misusing the derivation done earlier in A&M (Ch. 8).

I suppose I am ultimately confused about the nature of density of states., but perhaps someone can explain the above since I am ultimately trying to understand the attached from page 221 of A&M. Equation 12.7 includes the Fermi function, but in a filled band at $$T=0$$ this evaluates to 1.

When we are computing sums over $$k$$, we have to include the volume per $$k$$-state this as part of our integration measure, i.e., $$\sum_{\vec{k}}\to\frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}\int d^3k\,.$$ This integral on its own (i.e., when the integrand is equal to 1) yields the total number of states, and therefore $$\frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}d^3k$$ is equal to the number of states in the volume $$d^3k$$, and hence $$\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}$$ is equal to the number of states in the volume $$d^3k$$ per unit real-space volume. Thus $$\frac{d^3rd^3k}{(2\pi)^3}$$ is equal to the total number of states in phase-space volume $$d^3rd^3k$$, or, roughly speaking, the total number of states "at" the phase-space point $$(\vec{r},\vec{k})$$. (Multiplying by 2 for the two spin states then agrees with that paragraph from A&M.)

Now, if we integrate over just a single primitive unit cell in the reciprocal lattice, we should get $$\int_k \frac{d^3rd^3k}{(2\pi)^3} = \frac{d^3r}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{(2\pi)^3}{a^3}=\frac{d^3r}{a^3}\,,$$ since$$-$$assuming a cubic lattice of lattice constant $$a$$ for convenience$$-{(2\pi)^3}/{a^3}$$ is the volume of the primitive unit cell in $$k$$-space. Since a single band "lives" in this region, what we should be left with is the total number of states in a single band that are "at" the point $$\vec{r}$$. Note that this quantity is not the total number of states in a single band but rather a fraction of them, namely, the fraction $$\frac{d^3r}{a^3}$$ of them.

Now, when talking about states, this last paragraph doesn't make a lot of sense, because states don't live in $$r$$-space, they live in $$k$$-space, so we can't really talk about states that are "at" $$\vec{r}$$. However, assuming we have a filled band, we can interpret $$\frac{d^3rd^3k}{(2\pi)^3}$$ as the total number of electrons in the phase-space volume $$d^3rd^3k$$ (since all of these states are filled by electrons!), and hence, loosely speaking, $$\frac{d^3r}{a^3}$$ is on average the number of electrons occupying a particular band and "near" (i.e., within $$d^3r$$ around) the point $$\vec{r}$$ in real-space.

Finally, interpreting the paragraph from A&M, we note again that $$\frac{d^3rd^3k}{(2\pi)^3}$$ as the total number of states in the phase-space volume $$d^3rd^3k$$, and hence if a band is filled, $$\frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}$$ is the phase-space density of electrons. On the other hand, if the band is not filled, then, since some of those states are not filled, the electron number-density is therefore smaller than this value.

• Thanks very much for your answer. Unfortunately, I'm not sure I follow. In particular, I'm not sure I agree when you say that the given expression is "is equal to the number of states in the volume $d^3k$ per unit real-space volume." It seems to me that, based on how you (and A&M) derived this, it is necessary to specify that it is the number of states per unit volume, but that it only gives a number of states when it's multiplied by the entire volume of the given crystal. This seems to be a pertinent distinction since, when we...
– EE18
Apr 25, 2022 at 20:29
• later integrate over an entire primitive cell at a given position in real space, the tacit suggestion is that each k value "exists" at each position in real space (or am I misunderstanding?).
– EE18
Apr 25, 2022 at 20:30
• Or, rather, I should say that your answer seems to suggest EVERY k value exists at each position in real space.
– EE18
Apr 25, 2022 at 20:38
• @1729_SR It's difficult for me to see where you're coming from. $\sum_{\vec{k}}(1)$ must be the total number of states, almost by definition. Everything follows from there, as far as I can tell: dividing by $V$ turns it into a real-space density (i.e., quantity per unit real-space volume), and so multiplying by $d^3r$ turns it into a number of states "in" $d^3r$. However, as my second-to-last paragraph says, it's neither useful nor correct to talk about the states as being "at" a point in real-space: the states live in $k$-space, after all. Instead, it's only once we are able to... Apr 25, 2022 at 21:09
• ...interpret the quantity as a number-density of electrons (i.e., we're only looking at the states that are occupied by electrons) that we can start talking about the number of electrons "near" $\vec{r}$, say. Even then, I'm not sure that integrating over the 1st Brillouin zone and then calling that a density of electrons in real space is all that useful (even if interpreted as an average). The phase-space one maybe makes some sense, though, because then, as A&M goes on to do, one can use a Liouville's theorem argument. Apr 25, 2022 at 21:12