A curiosity question.

Radio Propagation within Earth's atmosphere is via atmosphere. Broadly speaking a signal loses strength between bouncing off the ionized layer, and absorption by various earthy elements.

If an identical signal were to be produced in free space, how far would it travel as compared to it's range within Earth's atmosphere?

EDIT: A commercial FM transmitter on Earth probably has a range no more than 25 miles where the listener uses a broadcast receiver. For the purpose of elaboration assume the the receiver being placed in static orbit - how far out could the same signal be generated, and still be intelligible?

  • $\begingroup$ I wonder how information is conveyed to satellites.(THIS is an answer to your question) $\endgroup$
    – Nix
    Commented Jul 9, 2013 at 12:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Another thing to think about: The spacecraft 'Voyager 1' was launched in 1977. It is now at a distance of $1.866 × 10^{10}$km, and it communicates to the earth by means of radio signals. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2013 at 12:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The question is ill-posed. You don't specify noise conditions, receiver sensitivity, and initial signal's ERP to get a sensible answer as to the maximum ranges at which both signals will be detected. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2013 at 12:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The main problem in radio communications is being able to recover the transmitted signal from the received, noisy signal; and it is mainly a channel coding problem. also, because the distances between spacecrafts (or stations, etc.)in space are very large, the transmission power is not too important and the successful communication depends on error-correction methods used. $\endgroup$
    – Mostafa
    Commented Jul 9, 2013 at 12:47
  • $\begingroup$ @mikhailcazi: The Voyagers use the Deep Space Network; apparently using PSK. My query is about the range of a system in space relative to the range of the same system on Earth. $\endgroup$
    – Everyone
    Commented Jul 10, 2013 at 1:28

1 Answer 1


First, no, "radio propagation" is not "via atmosphere". Different wavelengths get absorbed, reflected, or simply passed by different parts of the atmosphere. There is no one general rule. Many of our radio communications within the atmosphere are pretty much like they would be in free space, for example.

Second, all radio waves propagate infinitely in free space. There is no finite end to the propagation. What does matter in a practical sense is signal to noise ratio. Below some signal to noise ratio for whatever information encoding scheme is used, that information can't be recovered. Or more accurately, the error rate goes up as the signal to noise ratio goes down. At some point the errors in the information make is useless or "unreceivable" in a practical sense.


You are now asking specifically about "commercial FM", which I take to mean radio at around 100 MHz (3 meter wavelength). The primary mechanism limiting reception distance of such commercial FM stations is the curvature of the earth. The wavelength is too short for significant refraction around the earth, as happens with commercial AM at around 1 MHz (300 meters). Note that when you are in a car listening to a FM station at the fringe of its range, it will come and go as you get to tops of hills or dip between them.

Another factor is that here on earth there is significant interference from all kinds of unintentional broad-band radiators. Eventually at some distance the intended signal becomes too small relative to this background noise for the signal to be picked up well enough for your liking.

In the end, there are no hard limits and reception is about signal to noise ratio. That means you can extend the useful range of a transmission by reducing noise or selectively amplifying the signal. Note that spaceprobes usually emit only a few Watts or tens of Watts, whereas commercial FM stations usually a few kW. One important difference is that spaceprobe signals are picked up with highly directional antennas and extra low noise receivers. You wouldn't want to pay for one of those receivers in your car. The narrow beam of the receiving antenna greatly increases signal to noise ratio. Since the signal is coming from a point, the same signal is still picked up along a narrow beam. But, only a tiny fraction of the noise that is coming from all around is picked up along that same beam.

  • $\begingroup$ Pretty close to the answer I wished to learn; I've elaborated on the question a bit ... $\endgroup$
    – Everyone
    Commented Jul 10, 2013 at 1:46
  • $\begingroup$ Hm.. the reference to an FM signal was merely for the purpose of illustration $\endgroup$
    – Everyone
    Commented Jul 10, 2013 at 16:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.