3
$\begingroup$

I'm walking out of a graduate quantum midterm kicking myself because I was asked to compute density of states as a function of energy for a spin $1/2$ particle of mass $m$ in a hard wall box of length $L$, subjected to a magnetic field of strength $h^z>0$, and I just had no idea where to begin. I was given the eigenergies:

$$E(n,\sigma^z)=K_n-h^z\sigma^z$$

where $K_n=\frac{\pi^2\hbar^2n^2}{2mL^2}$. I was supposed to set $\sigma^z=1$ initially, then combine $\sigma^z=\pm 1$ results to get the full picture. I know that a state $n$ should have wave number:

$$k=\frac{n\pi }{L}=\sqrt{\frac{2m (K_n-h^z)}{\hbar}}$$

And that I can put each $k$ in a $1$-D box of size $L/\pi$, but I don't where to go from there and worse I don't actually know what I'm doing. I know this important for figuring out transition rates, but I just don't understand the reasoning presented by either my professor or Sakurai.

Ideally, if someone could explain what density of states is mathematically (every source I see just say its the number of states in the energy interval $(E,E+dE)$, which is a statement I understand from a physical perspective but means nothing to me mathematically since I'm fairly positive $dE$ is not a differential form in the sense that I'm used to), and how one generally finds it given that we know the energies as function of $n$, that would be amazing.

I apologize for my ignorance, or if anything I've said is incorrect, quantum mechanics seems especially difficult for me for some reason.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ For an electron we have nlmp n is energy level l is orbital type m is suborbital and p is spin in an orbital ss ps ps DPS DPS fdps fdps 1s 2s 2p 3s 3p 4s etc etc s has one orbital, p has 3 px py pz and 2 electrons in each orbital up and down with and against the magnetic field high and low energy. The energy level of all orbitals in s p d f are generate ie equal and within each orbtial $\endgroup$
    – ChemEng
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 1:28
  • $\begingroup$ @ChemEng It's a particle in a box, not a hydrogen atom. $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 1:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes so like for some particles you use 1/2 and -1/2 and for others u use 1 and -1 you do the math and get back to me $\endgroup$
    – ChemEng
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ @ChemEng That doesn't really explain what density of is mathematically. I'm sorry but I'm pretty lost here, and I don't think physical situations like the hydrogen atom will help me understand. Ideally I'd like to see how we are supposed to take an expression for the $n$th energy state, and then find the density of states using the definition $\rho(E)=$ number of states in an energy interval $E+dE$. $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 1:40
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have an understanding of what, say, the mass density $\rho(\vec{r})$ of a solid body is mathematically? If so, maybe you could attempt to port that understanding over to the density of states. $\endgroup$
    – d_b
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 2:30

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

The $dE$ is meant to be a differential form, and if you define $\Omega(E)$ as the number of states below a given energy, then the density of states is simply $d\Omega/dE$. Which connects to the definition that you were given by the definition of a derivative as $$\lim_{dE\to0}\frac{\Omega(E+dE)-\Omega(E)}{dE}=\lim_{dE\to0}\frac{\text{definition you were given}}{dE} $$

This isn't a super clear way of describing the density of states in this case, because the number of states below a specific energy $E$ is a discontinuous function in quantum mechanics when the eigenenergies are discrete. Thus, $\Omega$ is formally not differentiable.

The kludge that is often used here is to notice that, for a one-dimensional system, the quantum number $n$ is related to $\Omega$, and then treating both as a continuous variable that can be differentiated. So, for instance, in the particle in a well without the electric field, the density of states would be found as such:

$$ E_n=\frac{\pi^2\hbar^2n^2}{2mL^2} $$

$$ E(\Omega)=\frac{\pi^2\hbar^2\Omega^2}{2mL^2} $$

$$ \Omega(E)=\sqrt{\frac{2mL^2E}{\pi^2\hbar^2}} $$

$$ \frac{d\Omega}{dE}=\sqrt{\frac{mL^2}{2\pi^2\hbar^2E}} $$

Note that in this case, $n$ is just $\Omega$, because there is one state for each value of the quantum number. In the case of the problem you were asked, there are two states for each value of the quantum number. Although since they have different energies, you can't simply set $\Omega=2n$ and run with it, you should simply find the density of states for the two spin states separately and combine them.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The magnetic field makes them different energies though in this case. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 2:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ConnorDolan Yes, I didn't mean to imply you could just set $\Omega=2n$. Though you could make that assumption in some certain limits I suppose. $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 2:22
  • $\begingroup$ Just to make sure I follow, if we were to explicitly treat the case I was presented, would it be correct to say that the density of states is just $\sqrt{\frac{mL^2}{2\pi^2\hbar^2(E\pm h_z}}$ since the we have that $E_n\pm h_z=\frac{\pi^2\hbar^2n^2}{2mL^2}$? $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 2:36
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristopherQuinnLaFondJr. It doesn't really make sense to have a $\pm$ directly in your result. But you can just treat the two cases $\sigma^z=\pm1$ separately and then combine them at the end, so the density of states is $\sqrt{\frac{mL^2}{2\pi^2\hbar^2(E+ h_z)}}+\sqrt{\frac{mL^2}{2\pi^2\hbar^2(E- h_z)}}$. $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 2:48
3
$\begingroup$

The number of states $\Omega$ below an energy $E$ in general is given by counting the states $i$:

$\Omega(E)=\sum_{i} U(E-E_i)$

Where $U$ is the Heaviside step function.

The density of states is the derivative of the number of states:

$\rho(E)=\frac{\partial\Omega(E)}{\partial E}=\sum_i \delta(E-E_i)$

The real meat of solving these problems is to find how to express the sum over the states in terms of the variables you are given for the energy.

For your problem, $\sum_i = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{\sigma=-1, 1} $

So we have:

$\rho(E)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{\sigma=-1, 1}\delta(E-K_n+h\sigma)$

Which, if we make an approximation assuming L is large compared to our smallest wavelength, we can say $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \approx \frac{L}{\pi}\int dk$, and we know $k=n\pi/L$:

$\rho(E)=\frac{L}{\pi}\int dk \sum_{\sigma} \delta(E-k^2\hbar^2/2m+h\sigma)$

$\rho(E)=\frac{L}{\pi}\sum_{\sigma}\sqrt{{m}/{2\hbar^2(E-h\sigma)}}$

$\rho(E)=\frac{L}{\pi}\left(\sqrt{{m}/{2\hbar^2(E-h)}} + \sqrt{{m}/{2\hbar^2(E+h)}}\right)$

In general, there isn't a way to find the density of states. You can make complicated combinatorics problems, or sums that don't approximate into integrals in which you can evaluate the delta function.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I upvoted your answer because I really do appreciate it and think it is very clear and helpful, but for some reason the other formulation makes a little more sense to me, so I chose it as the "correct" answer. Thank you very much though $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Mar 25, 2022 at 2:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.