2
$\begingroup$

In the context of Lagrangian of Standard Model of particle physics, is the usage of the notation with $B_{\mu}$ and $W_{\mu}$ before electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB), and the notation with $\gamma$, $Z$, $W^{\pm}$ after electroweak symmetry breaking?

Or is the notation independent to that?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

You can use whatever notation / representation for the fields you want to; physics can't depend on your choice of variables. But yes $B_\mu$ and $W_\mu$ are more useful variables for describing the Standard Model when the Higgs vev is zero, and $\gamma, Z, W^{\pm}$ are more useful when the Higgs vev takes its present-day value.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your kind explanation. $\endgroup$ Mar 13, 2022 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Andrew sorry for the trivial question. Did you use the expression "higgs vev zero/not zero" rather than "symmetry breaking" because of this physics.stackexchange.com/a/439384/226902 ? $\endgroup$
    – Quillo
    Jan 13, 2023 at 9:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MathieuKrisztian As far as I'm concerned, "electroweak symmetry breaking" is equivalent to "Higgs vev is nonzero." Although, your linked answer is correct, that you can't really spontaneously break a gauge symmetry, so "spontaneous symmetry breaking" is a misnomer for describing what happens in the electroweak sector, even though that's the standard terminology. $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Jan 13, 2023 at 11:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.