3
$\begingroup$

I'm studying the Susskind lecture on statistical mechanics. A potential energy of pairwise interactions has been defined:

$$\sum_{n>m}U(|x_n -x_m|)$$

We want to calculate the partition function, and we start by evaluating the potential energy term by considering the interaction of a single pair, through the integral of potential energy between two particles over all possible positions:

$$\int dx_1^3 dx_2^3 U(|x_1-x_2|)$$

Now,there are 2 steps,

  1. Assuming that $U$ goes to zero at large distances, hold particle $1$ fixed and integrate over all possible positions of particle $2$: $\int dx^3 U(|x|)=U_0$
  2. Integrating over the position of particle $1$ gives a factor of volume, $V$.

Conclusion: $$\int dx_1^3 dx_2^3 U(|x_1-x_2|)=VU_0$$

I cannot understand steps 1 and 2. It looks pure magic to me. Is there a formal way to explain how the integral is broken up in two parts, why we can consider the position fixed, and why the results are equivalent?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

For simplicity, let us first assume that the potential $U$ has finite range: $U(|x|)=0$ whenever $|x|>R$. Then, for any $x_1$ located at a distance at least $R$ from the boundary of the vessel enclosing your system, $$ \int_V\mathrm{d}x_2\, U(|x_1-x_2|) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\mathrm{d}y\, U(|y|) = U_0, $$ where the first identity follows from the change of variables $y=x_2-x_1$, (which has Jacobian $1$). Then, splitting the integral over $x_1$ into two parts according to whether $x_1$ is at a distance at least $R$ from the boundary or not, we obtain $$ \int_V\mathrm{d}x_1\int_V\mathrm{d}x_2\, U(|x_1-x_2|) = U_0 V + O(R\partial V), $$ where the error term is of the order of the area $\partial V$ of the vessel.

The situation is entirely similar if $U$ does not have finite range (but is, of course, integrable). First, we can fix some $\epsilon>0$ and observe that there exists $R(\epsilon)$ such that $$ \Bigl| \int_{|y|\leq R(\epsilon)}\mathrm{d}y\, U(|y|) - U_0 \Bigr| \leq \epsilon. $$ From this, we get $$ \int_V\mathrm{d}x_1\int_V\mathrm{d}x_2\, U(|x_1-x_2|) = U_0 V + O(\epsilon V) + O(R(\epsilon)\partial V). $$ Letting $V\to\infty$ (say, along a sequence of cubes or other reasonable shapes) and then letting $\epsilon\to 0$, we obtain $$ \lim_{V\to\infty} \frac1V \int_V\mathrm{d}x_1\int_V \mathrm{d}x_2\, U(|x_1-x_2|) = U_0, $$ which is a precise way of stating the identity.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Prof. Yvan Velenik, I'd have a question regarding your answer: In e.g. Wolfgang Nolting. Theoretical Physics 9. Fundamentals of Many-body Physics. Springer. Second Edition chapter 2, p.45, right after equation 2.48, the last equality you've derived but without the limit for the function $e^{-\alpha |x-y|}/(|x-y|)$ is given. Is this correct or meant to be in the limit $V\to\infty$? If you have time, I'd really appreciate if you could take a look on my related math SE question. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 12, 2022 at 7:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JasonFunderberker I am at a conference this week. I'll try to look at that as soon as possible. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 13, 2022 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you in advance! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 16, 2022 at 20:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I looked at your question on Math.SE. The answer is basically the one I've given above: to make precise sense of the identity you want, divide by $V$ and let $V\to\infty$. This is necessary to get rid of $o(V)$ error terms, as explained in the answer above. In Nolting's book, he's also explicitly taking the $V\to\infty$ limit (two lines below (2.48)), although he's being very cavalier with it, since there's still a $V$ remaining in his formula after having taken the limit (in the equation preceding equation (2.49))! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 19, 2022 at 10:33
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! Yes, Nolting used a limit, but before he uses an equality sign in the same line, which confused me. Do you happen to know a book/ reference where this is discussed or derived in (more) detail? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 19, 2022 at 10:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.