2
$\begingroup$

This should be a relatively easy problem but I think I am missing something somewhere. This problem consists of a object that is being thrown into the air at $t = 4s$ at a velocity $v_0$

here is my acceleration function: $a(n) = \begin{cases} 0, & t<t_1 \\ g, & t≥t_1 \end{cases} $

Where

$g = - 9.8m/s^2$

$t_1 = 4s$

$x_0=0m$

$v_0$ is the velocity at which the object is being thrown up in the air at.

When I derive the velocity function it seems to be correct from what I could find, $v(n) = \begin{cases} 0, & t<t_1 \\ gt-gt_1+v_0, & t≥t_1 \end{cases} $

But when I go to derive the position function I get lost.

$y(t) - x_0= \int_{t_1}^tv(t)dt => [\frac{1}{2}gt^2-gt{t_1}+v_ot]_{t_1}^t =>\frac{1}{2}gt^2-gt{t_1}+v_ot -(\frac{1}{2}g{t_1}^2-g{t_1}^2+v_ot_1) $

When I then go apply this to the rest of the problem I get nonsense answers.

Can someone please let me know where I've gone wrong. Sorry if this is an easy problem, I am a beginner to physics.

PS: I know you can solve for this algebraically, you get $y(t) = \begin{cases} 0, & t>t_1 \\ \frac{1}{2}g(t+t_1)+v_0(t+t_1), & t≥t_1 \end{cases}$ but I would like to know the derivation based on the calculus of the problem as it is more relevant to the course I am following.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ If $v(t) = 0$ for $t < t_1$ and then $v(t_1) = v_0 > 0$ starting from $t = t_1$ then there is a discontinuity in $v$ at that time, are you sure this is what you mean? It does not follow from the given $a(t)$ at least, and seems unpysical. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2022 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ Also, if by your PS you mean that $x(t)$ is supposed to be $\frac{1}{2}g(t+t_1) + v_0 (t+t_1)$ then that is also wrong, for starters the expression does not have the correct dimensions (the first term has units of speed). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2022 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ I made a few quick edits to hopefully clear things up. I should mention that the equation in my PS does in fact work for the problem in terms of the numerical value it spits out, though I do see your point about the dimensions. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2022 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ "(...)the equation in my PS does in fact work for the problem in terms of the numerical value it spits out(...)" is surely a coincidence. The numerical values don't mean anything without their units: if you have a question whose answer is supposed to be 100m/s, then the formula $50 kg + 50m/s$ does not achieve that result ;) $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2022 at 21:59

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Your integration is correct. It just needs some completing-the-square TLC.

$$ \frac{1}{2} g t^2 - g t t_1 + v_0 t - \frac{1}{2} g t_1^2 + g t_1^2 - v_0 t_1 $$

$$ \frac{1}{2} g\left( t^2 - 2 t t_1 + t_1^2 \right) + v_0 (t-t_1) $$

$$ \frac{1}{2} g\left(t - t_1 \right)^2 + v_0 (t - t_1) $$

which is what your PS should have said.

Notice that we can, from the very beginning of the problem, make a change of variables

$$ t' = t - t_1 $$

Then all integrals are from $t' = 0$ and we find

$$v(t') = gt' + v_0$$ and $$x(t') = \frac{1}{2}g(t')^2 + v_0 t' $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your help! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2022 at 22:13
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2022 at 22:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.