0
$\begingroup$

In the demonstration of the Clausius theorem in classical thermodynamics my book uses the fact that $Q_{net}\le0$ is negative in a cyclic monotherm (meaning with one heat reservoir) transformation. This fact, however, left me a bit uneasy. Taking, as usual, a Carnot cycle as an example, and calling the adiabatic and the isotherm expansions done, couldn't I just do an adiabatic compression to bring it back to the initial state? The second law wouldn't be violated: the heat absorbed wouldn't entirely be converted into work. The expression of the first principle, though, is indeed a bit strange: since $\Delta U$ is $0$ in any cycle, then $Q = W$, and my reasoning breaks down. I can't really see what's going on here, would it be theoretically possible a process similar to the one I described? If not, why so?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Let's assume that the thermodynamic state of the system can be represented in two dimensions (like on a pressure-volume diagram for an ideal gas). Let's say further that the cycle starts at point $a$, undergoes an isothermal expansion to point $b$, then undergoes an adiabatic expansion to point $c$.

As far as I understand, you now want to take the system from point $c$ to point $a$ by way of an adiabatic compression. This is not possible because there is only one adiabatic curve passing through point $c$; it is precisely the curve along which the system underwent the adiabatic expansion in the first place. There is no adiabatic curve connecting $a$ and $c$.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.