3
$\begingroup$

In chapter 12.1 of Peskin and Schroeder we derive the propagator of a high momenta shell of a $\phi^4$ theory. Following the derivation, we ignore quartic terms as well as mass terms.

The original action is $$ \int{d^dx\left(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\hat{\phi})^2+\frac{1}{2}m^2\hat{\phi}^2+\lambda\left(\frac{1}{6}\phi^3\hat{\phi}+\frac{1}{4}\phi^2\hat{\phi}^2+\frac{1}{6}\phi\hat{\phi}^3+\frac{1}{4!}\hat{\phi}^4\right)\right)}\tag{12.5} $$ then we only keep the first term giving us $$ \mathcal{S}=\int{d^dx\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\hat{\phi})^2}=\int{d^dx\frac{1}{2}\hat{\phi}\partial^2\hat{\phi}}=\frac{1}{2}\int{\frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\hat{\phi}^*(k)k^2\hat{\phi}(k)}. $$ First of all, my question is the following. Shouldn't the second $\phi$ be $\phi^*$? I was under the impression that the '$^*$' is used because the fields are Fourier transformed.

Furthermore, how do we get the following propagator (how can we derive it?)? $$ \frac{\int{\mathcal{D}\hat{\phi}}\exp(-\mathcal{S})\hat{\phi}(k)\hat{\phi}(p)}{\int{\mathcal{D}\hat{\phi}\exp(-\mathcal{S})}}=\frac{1}{k^2}(2\pi)^d\delta^{(d)}(k+p)\Theta(k)\tag{12.8} $$ where $\Theta(k)$ is defined in eq. (12.9).

Note: the momentum integrals are down between $b\Lambda \leq k < \Lambda$ for which $\Lambda$ is the momenta cutoff and $b$ a parameter between 0 and 1.

From these I understand the use of the step-function $\Theta$ but I'm not sure how we rederive the propagator. This is essentially the same as the klein-gordon propagator but in Euclidean space and in the limit of low mass ($m^2\ll \Lambda^2$).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ $\hat{\phi}^*$ denotes the complex conjugate of $\hat{\phi}$. $\hat{\phi}$ is used for both the field and its Fourier transformation in this case. If you just plug the definition of $\hat\phi(x)$ in terms of $\hat\phi(k)$ into the integral, you get the relationship $\int{d^dx\frac{1}{2}\hat{\phi}\partial^2\hat{\phi}}=\int{\frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\hat{\phi}^*(k)k^2\hat{\phi}(k)}$ $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 9, 2022 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Can you also explain why we get the complex conjugate? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 9, 2022 at 13:53

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In answer to your first question, $$\int{d^dx\frac{1}{2}\hat{\phi}(x)\partial^2\hat{\phi}(x)}=\int d^dx \frac{1}{2}\int d^dk e^{-ikx}\hat\phi(k)\partial^2\left(\int d^dk' e^{-ik'x}\phi(k')\right)$$ $$=\int d^dx \frac{1}{2}\int d^dk e^{-ikx}\hat\phi(k)\left(\int d^dk' i^2k'^2e^{-ik'x}\phi(k')\right)$$ $$=\int d^dx \frac{1}{2}\int d^dk e^{ikx}\hat\phi(-k)\left(\int d^dk' (-1)k'^2e^{-ik'x}\phi(k')\right)$$ $$=-\int d^dkd^dk'\left(\int d^dx e^{i(k'-k)x}\right)\frac{1}{2}\hat\phi(-k) k'^2\phi(k')$$ $$=-\int d^dkd^dk'\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\delta^{(d)}\left(k-k'\right)\frac{1}{2}\hat\phi(-k) k'^2\phi(k')$$ $$=-\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\hat\phi(-k) k^2\phi(k)=-\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\hat\phi^*(k) k^2\phi(k).$$ There may be a sign error in there somewhere.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is really just a special case of Parseval's/Plancherel's Theorem $\endgroup$
    – Josh Newey
    Commented Jul 13 at 4:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.