0
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a function $f(x)$ and its fourier transformation $$f(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dpf(p)e^{-ipx}.$$

And let's define $\hat{P}$ as space inversion opeartor that maps $x \rightarrow-x$ and also $p \rightarrow -p$. Meaning $\hat{P}f(x)=f(-x)$

Now when I act with this operator to $f(x)$

$$\hat{P}f(x)=\hat{P}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dpf(p)e^{-ipx}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dpf(-p)e^{-ipx}$$

and by taking $p\rightarrow -p$

$$\int_{\infty}^{-\infty}-dpf(p)e^{ipx}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dpf(p)e^{ipx}=f(-x)$$

To get the result I want I ignored how parity transforms the integral. How should the integral boundaries and $dp$ term change under parity operation? From an ad-hoc point of view, I can find a reason for both cases.

  1. Either $dp$ maps into $-dp$ but also the integral boundaries map into each other so the parity transformation leaves the integral invariant
  2. Or since we are looking at infinitesimal portions $dp$ the directions do not matter.

So what would happen if I had non-symmetric boundaries.

$$\hat{P}\int_{-L}^{L/2}dxf(x)$$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

You need to be a bit careful here. Let me go through this step-by-step.

${\hat P}$ is an operator that acts on states in the Hilbert space. In particular, when working in the $x$ basis, it acts on wave-functions. It does not act on every object that has $x$ dependence. For instance, if $f(x)$ is a function [often referred to as a $c$-number] and $\Psi(x)$ is a wave-function, then we have $$ {\hat P} [ f(x) \Psi(x)] = f(x) {\hat P} [ \Psi(x)] = f(x) \Psi(-x). $$ Here, we used that the fact that ${\hat P}$ is a linear operator, so that ${\hat P} [ a \Psi] = a {\hat P} \Psi$ for all $c$-numbers $a$.

Now, let's turn to your example. You want to determine the action $$ {\hat P}\,\Psi(x) = {\hat P} \int_{\mathbb R} dp e^{- i p x} \Psi(p) $$ For linear operators ${\hat P} (\Psi_1+\Psi_2) = {\hat P} \Psi_1 + {\hat P} \Psi_2$ so we can move ${\hat P}$ past the integral sign (which is just glorified summation), $$ {\hat P}\,\Psi(x) =\int_{\mathbb R} dp {\hat P} [ e^{- i p x} \Psi(p)] $$ Next $e^{-ipx}$ is just a $c$-number so we can move it past ${\hat P}$ as well \begin{align} {\hat P}\,\Psi(x) &= \int_{\mathbb R} dp e^{- i p x} {\hat P} [ \Psi(p)]\\ &= \int_{\mathbb R} dp e^{- i p x} \Psi(-p) \end{align} We can now change integration variable $p \to -p$ in the usual way and we find \begin{align} {\hat P}\,\Psi(x) &= \int_{\mathbb R} dp e^{ i p x} \Psi(p) \\ &= \int_{\mathbb R} dp e^{ - i p (- x) } \Psi(p) \\ &= \Psi(-x) \end{align}

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.