2
$\begingroup$

I am studying Kruskal coordinates for my General Relativity course. On the book Spacetime and Geometry: An introduction to General Relativity by Sean Carroll, the author gives the metric in Kruskal coordinates $$\mathrm{d}s^2=\frac{32G^3M^3}{r}e^{-r/2GM}(-\mathrm{d}T^2+\mathrm{d}R^2)+r^2\mathrm{d}\Omega^2$$ and the Kruskal diagram with $\theta$ and $\phi$ suppressed. How can I relate this diagram with a Minkowski diagram? What does the origin of the Kruskal diagram mean? The author then says that every point is a 2-sphere. How can I imagine this? Can I draw this diagram restoring, let's say, the $\phi$ coordinate in order to get a three-dimensional spacetime diagram?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

You can relate the Kruskal diagram to the Minkowski diagram by realising that, because of the (-+++) signature, $dT^{2}$ takes the role of the time-like coordinate, while $dR^{2}$ takes the role of the space-like coordinate. You can interpret the Kruskal diagram as a "Miskowski diagram of curved spacetime".

You can therefore also introduce lightcones to the diagram by considering the $ds^{2}=0$ null geodesics. It is here where $\theta$ and $\phi$ are surpressed by choosing radial light ($d\phi=0$) in the equatorial plane ($\theta=\pi/2$). By setting these variables to a constant you are limiting the diagram to a 2-dimensional slice of the actual geometry. Though, the surpressed degrees of freedom still exist. For every point, you have neglected the 2-sphere-spanning coordinates. In other words: every point is a 2-sphere.

You can restore $\phi$ by rotating the 2D cut light cones to represent actual cones. Just like with flat space Minkowski diagrams.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.