Condsider an incompressible, inviscid, irrotational fluid with constant density $\rho$. Let $\overrightarrow u$ be its velocity field, $p$ its pressure field and $\overrightarrow F$ be an external body force given by some potential $\chi$ so that $ -\nabla \chi = \overrightarrow F$. The momentum equation reads $$ \frac{ \partial \overrightarrow u}{\partial t}= -\nabla(\frac{p}{\rho}+\frac{1}{2}|\overrightarrow u|^2+\chi).$$ I was asked to show that $$\frac{p}{\rho}+\frac{1}{2}|\overrightarrow u|^2+\chi$$ is constant in steady flow, and the impled line of reasoning is to say that it simply follows from $$ 0= -\nabla(\frac{p}{\rho}+\frac{1}{2}|\overrightarrow u|^2+\chi).$$ But I can only see why we may conclude that $$\frac{p}{\rho}+\frac{1}{2}|\overrightarrow u|^2+\chi$$ is a function of time. And we could have this be any function of time, by absorbing it into $\chi$. Am I missing something?

  • $\begingroup$ In steady flow you have $\partial/\partial t=0$ so the right hand side of your equations cannot change as a function of time. $\endgroup$
    – Newbie
    Jan 21 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Newbie Here by steady I mean $\partial \overrightarrow u / \partial t = 0$, what does you $\partial / \partial t$ act on? I see that all the gradients in my equations are time independent, but that wouldn't rule out some time dependence in $p/ \rho+u^2/2+\chi$? $\endgroup$ Jan 21 at 17:12
  • $\begingroup$ Are you worried that your right hand side cannot change as a function of space but can change as a function of time? $\endgroup$
    – Newbie
    Jan 21 at 17:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Newbie Yes exactly. $\endgroup$ Jan 21 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: The term involving $|\vec u|^{2}$ cannot change as a function of time since you already have set $\partial\vec u/\partial t=0$ on the left hand side. $\endgroup$
    – Newbie
    Jan 21 at 17:18

1 Answer 1


Your observation is correct. For steady irrotational flow of an incompressible, inviscid fluid with constant density, the Euler equation of momentum reduces to

$$\nabla \left(\frac{p}{\rho} + \frac{1}{2} |\mathbf{u}|^2 + \chi \right) = 0$$

Integrating the components with respect to the spatial variables, we get the general solution

$$\frac{p}{\rho} + \frac{1}{2} |\mathbf{u}|^2 + \chi = c(t),$$

where the arbitrary function $t \mapsto c(t)$ changes nothing about the flow field and can be absorbed into the pressure. Recall that the pressure field corresponding to a particular velocity field is never uniquely determined since an arbitrary reference pressure can be added. The pressure and body-force potential only affect the velocity through their spatial gradients and adding an arbitrary function of time has no impact.

More generally for irrotational flow where $\nabla \times \mathbf{u} =0$, the velocity field is the gradient of a potential, $\mathbf{u} = \nabla\phi$, and the momentum equation reduces to

$$\frac{\partial\nabla \phi}{\partial t}= -\nabla \left(\frac{p}{\rho} + \frac{1}{2} |\nabla \phi|^2 + \chi \right),$$

which upon integration yields

$$\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}+\frac{p}{\rho} + \frac{1}{2} |\nabla \phi|^2 + \chi = c(t)$$

Again, in steady flow where $\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = 0$, the appearance of the time-dependent $c(t)$ is not excluded.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your reply! I think this settles it for me, and I also happened to have a chat to the relevant professor who gave me a similar reply. $\endgroup$ Jan 27 at 23:19
  • $\begingroup$ @LobLikelyhood: You're welcome. $\endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 28 at 3:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.