0
$\begingroup$

We have studied approx 4.6% of normal/ordinary matter in the universe and everything till now we observed are a part of this 4.6%

enter image description here

I always have doubt. this 4.6% include all the matters and energies apart from dark matter and dark energy

4.6% Includes

  1. Normal matter
  2. Normal energies (Cosmic, Mass-energy, photon, etc)
  3. Anti-matter
  4. exotic matter
  5. virtual particles
Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Search terms: “radiation era,” “matter era.” $\endgroup$
    – rob ♦
    Commented Jan 15, 2022 at 18:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @rob So at the radiation era there is no matter? $\endgroup$
    – Rajeev Ranjan Sharma
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 5:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There was still matter during the radiation-dominated era, just like there is still matter and radiation during the current dark-energy-dominated era. A search for those terms will take you to one of a number of histories whose discussions will illuminate your question. $\endgroup$
    – rob ♦
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 6:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @rob at different time period of universe we observed different dominated era. So, every fundamental matter, energies and force convert into another and vise versa. Eg, normal matter can convert to dark matter? $\endgroup$
    – Rajeev Ranjan Sharma
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 16:46

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5
$\begingroup$

Yes, this 4.6% includes everything we know about except dark matter and dark energy. So it includes atoms, baryons, leptons, neutrinos, antimatter, cosmic rays, and the mass-energy from virtual particles as well (much of the mass of the proton and of atoms comes from that). Depending on your definition of "exotic matter", that's either hypothetical and so everybody's guess, or things like positronium which isn't stable but would be part of those 4.6%, or could be a term for dark matter, in which case it would be part of, well, dark matter.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Exotic matter : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_matter $\endgroup$
    – Rajeev Ranjan Sharma
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 5:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So this mean our whole universe is made of up approx 2.3% of matter because till now we have not detected antimatter naturally in our universe and we assume it lies outside of our universe or in other dimension. Volume of matter = volume of anti-matter $\endgroup$
    – Rajeev Ranjan Sharma
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 6:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No, in this context, antimatter is just matter too. Plus, the amount of antimatter in our universe is negligible. It is hardly meaningful to contemplate what would be "outside" our universe when "universe" already means "everything that is accessible to us". Also, "other dimensions" are entirely hypothetical. $\endgroup$
    – rfl
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 15:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Exotic matter is not a hypothetical. we already have synthetic exotic matter Positronium. or it something different? physics.stackexchange.com/questions/689057/… $\endgroup$
    – Rajeev Ranjan Sharma
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 16:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Semantics. Depends on the field. Nuclear physics might think of positronium as being exotic, dark matter particle physicists might not. Point being: Positronium would be part of those 4.6% as well, though of course it isn't stable. $\endgroup$
    – rfl
    Commented Jan 16, 2022 at 20:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.