4
$\begingroup$

I was watching Eugene Khutoryansky's physics video about Einstein's Gravito-Electromagnetism, Gravity of moving mass in General Relativity . In that, he discussed why maxwell's electromagnetism laws hold for special relativity also. He took the following situation:

Adam is in a spaceship or the reference frame of two charged particles such that their gravitational force cancels their electromagnetic repulsion. Adam would see no magnetic force since charges are at rest according to his frame. Now Sarah is watching Adam from a ground reference and sees the charges moving and hence they must exert an attractive magnetic force pushing particles towards each other. But now Eugene, said that a force (gravity) analogous to the magnetic force produced by moving charge, is produced by moving mass, which will be repulsive, and will balance the attractive magnetic force.

Now I became confused here, what is this "new gravity force" (introduced at the 6-minute mark in the video)? I never heard about it before, at least in high school. Is it a mathematical trick or tweaking? Or is there really is a repulsive gravitational force that is exerted by moving masses? So this is my doubt here, can someone please explain this further?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See here. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 13, 2022 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ @J.G. Sorry to say but I can't really comprehend clearly from the wikipedia, I would like a more simpler approach with not very heavy maths. $\endgroup$ Jan 13, 2022 at 18:32
  • $\begingroup$ A similar question : physics.stackexchange.com/q/677290 $\endgroup$
    – The Tiler
    Jan 13, 2022 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ this force is a real consequence of general relativity, and its measurement was the main task of gravity probe B en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_Probe_B $\endgroup$ Jan 13, 2022 at 23:18

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

It makes sense that you had never heard of it in high school: this is actually a prediction of General Relativity, a subject complicated enough that many physicists will only study it in depth after they had already concluded undergraduate school. In this answer, I'll try to give you a general idea without going too deep into the mathematics.

First of all, General Relativity does not treat gravity as a force. Instead, gravity is understood as spacetime curvature: the reason things fall is because spacetime is curved, and hence things move in curved paths as a consequence. Think for example, about an ant moving on a rolled up sheet of paper: if the ant moves always straight ahead, it might still find itself back where it started, for example. It moves in curved paths not because of some force, but simply because it's moving on a curved surface. Gravity works in a similar way.

Now, the mathematics of General Relativity is quite complicated, and sometimes we want to avoid dealing with it in full detail. If the gravitational fields are not too intense (in other words, if we're interested in a problem where spacetime is not too curved), we can approximate the gravitational field with a force. For very weak fields, that is the Newtonian theory you learn at school. Newton's gravity is a weak field limit of GR. However, we can do slightly better.

Given GR, we can consider a simple distribution of matter, such as a possibly moving mass. Doing the calculations in GR and making a few approximations, we can get to something called Gravitoelectromagnetism. This approximation treats the gravitational field in a way very similar to how we treat electromagnetic phenomena. It is not as precise as full GR, but it is much simpler, and hence we often prefer to use it instead of solving the full complicated equations. In Physics, at the end of the day we're interested in comparing out computations to experiment, so as long as your experiment is not so sensitive that it will notice the problems of your approximation, this is fine.

In this approximation, you can see exactly the effect you mentioned: there appears a gravitational analogue of the magnetic field, leading to results just as the one you mentioned. Notice that this is not "a new force": instead, it would be more fair to say it is a consequence of the fact that gravity is not even a force to begin with. This effect is not a mathematical trick, it is real, as pointed out in the comments. The thing is it is really subtle, so it is quite difficult to notice it in most situations.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

Adam is in a spaceship holding two magnets so that force exerted by his hands cancels their electromagnetic repulsion. Adam would see no electric force since magnets are at rest according to his frame.

Now Sarah is watching Adam from a ground reference and sees the magnets moving and hence they must exert an attractive electric force.

A force, analogous to a magnetic force produced by moving charge, is produced by moving magnet, moving muscle, moving planet, moving anything. Which is a good thing as forces that are balanced in one frame are balanced in other frames too.

To clarify a bit, the "magnetic force" for moving magnets is electric force. Which has been known since 1905, at least.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ sorry to say but your answer is seeming confusing to me $\endgroup$ Jan 14, 2022 at 5:48
  • $\begingroup$ @KshitijKumar Well I just said the same as Eugene. About all kind of forces. $\endgroup$
    – stuffu
    Jan 14, 2022 at 5:56
  • $\begingroup$ OP asks about how can it be that gravity has a magnetic analogue, not if Physics should be consistent in all reference frames (this is taken as an assumption in their question). I fail to see how this answer addresses the question, so I'm downvoting it $\endgroup$ Jan 23, 2022 at 18:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.