0
$\begingroup$

Most discussions of the magnetic vector potential defined through $\mathbf{B}=\nabla\times\mathbf{A}$ are only for working with static electric fields (for example, Griffiths:

enter image description here

If we instead require that

$$\nabla\times\mathbf{B}=\nabla\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A}) = \nabla(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{A})\ -\nabla^2\mathbf{A} = \mu_0\mathbf{J} +\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{E}}{\partial t}$$

using the full form of Ampere's law, then we can still have the freedom to choose an $\mathbf{A}$ with zero divergence, giving us a form of Poisson's equation:

$$\nabla^2\mathbf{A} = -\mu_0\mathbf{J} -\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{E}}{\partial t}$$

Which can be solved in principle using analogies to the electric scalar potential $V$.

Why is this form of the magnetic vector potential in its full generality seldom seen? Is there a contradiction which prevents its use?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Turn ahead to Section 10.1 in your copy of Griffiths, and look for the phrase "Coulomb gauge". $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2022 at 14:17
  • $\begingroup$ BTW your curl of the curl you wrote down is in correct $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2022 at 14:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Why is this form of the magnetic vector potential in its full generality seldom seen?" Why should choosing a specific gauge ($\nabla\cdot A=0$) be considered "full generality"? $\endgroup$
    – oliver
    Commented Jan 10, 2022 at 14:32
  • $\begingroup$ to add on to Oliver. All gauges are all equally correct and all predict the same E and B fields $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2022 at 14:53

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Yes it can be used,

Given,$ \nabla × A = B$

Then

$\nabla ×E = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}$

$\nabla × E = -\frac{\partial (\nabla × A) }{\partial t}$

$\nabla × E = -\nabla × \frac{\partial A }{\partial t}$

$\nabla × E + \nabla × \frac{\partial A }{\partial t} = 0$

$\nabla × (E + \frac{\partial A }{\partial t})= 0$

Because the curl of this quantity is zero, it can be written as the gradient of a scalar function ( or the negative of a gradient of a scalar function, which is used to match the definition of electrostatic potential)

$E + \frac{\partial A }{\partial t} = -\nabla V$

$E = -\nabla V -\frac{\partial A }{\partial t} $

From here we can substitute the definitions of E into the other maxwell equations

This will obtain 2 equations that interlink A and V in terms of the source terms $\rho$ and J.

using the "lorenz" gauge choice ( not lorentz) we can decouple these and solve easier( or using the coulomb gauge)

This is called the potential formulation of maxwells equations

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Also, when learning the potential formulation it is important you actually understand WHY we can prescribe the divergence of A to follow specific gauges. Look at my answer here ; physics.stackexchange.com/questions/682626/… $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 10, 2022 at 14:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.