5
$\begingroup$

why airplanes are banned with use of cellphones? What were the impacts while we answer an call or make an call ,what was the physical reason behind the ban of using cellphone inside airplanes ?

I expect answer related to physics here

$\endgroup$

closed as off topic by user1504, David Z Jun 19 '13 at 19:20

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ I'd like to request that any answer to this comes with references. This question has multiple conflicting answers, many of which are incorrect. So it would be nice to know that the proposed answer is credible and not based on something someone once heard or something someone is making up on the spot. $\endgroup$ – Jim Jun 19 '13 at 17:44
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Sounds like this could also be asked on skeptics.stackexchange.com My own theory - if I found myself seated next to someone yelling over a bad connection about their meaningless life for 6 hours, the number of passengers deboarding that plane would be notably 1 short of the number who got on... $\endgroup$ – user10851 Jun 19 '13 at 17:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Related question on Skeptics.SE: skeptics.stackexchange.com/q/1118 $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 19 '13 at 17:55
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ In the end this is a question about policy and technology not about physics as such. Qmechanic's link cover the bases pretty well. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Jun 19 '13 at 18:28
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This should really be posted in electronics.stackexchange.com. $\endgroup$ – user6972 Jun 19 '13 at 19:04
15
$\begingroup$

This problem originated with passengers using electronics (they call them PED's - portable electronic devices) during flight. While all consumer electronics have to be qualified by a regulatory body (FCC, etc.) to prove they do not emit harmful interference, this doesn't mean they emit no interference especially to high gain sensitive navigation equipment.

"The first national committee that investigated interference by passenger-carried PEDs was created in the early 1960s. Its activities were initiated by a report that a passenger-operated portable FM broadcast receiver caused an airplane navigation system to indicate that the airplane was off course by more than 10 deg. The airplane was actually on course and, when the portable receiver was turned off, the malfunction ceased. A final report from this committee, RTCA DO-119, was issued in 1963 and resulted in the revision of the FAA Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) by establishing a new rule (FAR 91.19, now 91.21), which states that the responsibility for ensuring that PEDs will not cause interference with airplane navigation or communication systems remained with the operator of the airplane." -- from Boeing This reference also has some incidents which I hightlight here:

  • 1995, 737 A passenger laptop computer was reported to cause autopilot disconnects during cruise.
  • 1996/1997, 767 Over a period of eight months, Boeing received five reports on interference with various navigation equipment (uncommanded rolls, displays blanking, flight management computer [FMC]/ autopilot/standby altimeter inoperative, and autopilot disconnects) caused by passenger operation of a popular handheld electronic game device.
  • 1998, 747 A passenger’s palmtop computer was reported to cause the airplane to initiate a shallow bank turn. One minute after turning the PED off, the airplane returned to "on course."

Now this "all electronics off" rule has become legacy and broadly applied. There are a mix of opinions about how relevant it is today. But the fact remains that while manufacturers do a decent job of limiting RFI (radio frequency interference) there is still a good chance that the very sensitive radios on board aircrafts could have a problem with one of the RFI emissions.

And due to the nature of the aircraft radios it is almost impossible to test every possible interference scenario. These radios do a lot of frequency mixing, amplification and filtering. If you have ever done a detailed spurious analysis on a mixer, you'll know that each time you mix a single you create a tremendous number of possible interference problems.

There has been recent studies showing RFI issues but with a very low probability (1:1,000,000) of harmful interference. (Sorry, you have to pay $63 to read the report). So for everyone's safety the "all electronics off" rule during critical takeoff/landing has remained in effect. For a good overview, I suggest you read the first link in my answer from Boeing.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ FYI -- I put my answer here because I found the sceptics link a little light on facts. $\endgroup$ – user6972 Jun 19 '13 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Lonelybaby I don't quite understand your question. But if the phone is set to airplane mode, the transmitter will be off making the PED "Non-intentionally transmitting" which some airlines relax their rules for. I suggest you read the full article from the Boeing link provided. $\endgroup$ – user6972 Jun 19 '13 at 19:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.