I have heard that there is less oxygen as you go higher (that's what my teacher told me). A reason that supports that is, as you go to higher altitudes, it becomes more and more difficult to breathe. But, I also read on the internet, that the amount of oxygen remains same but the air pressure drops, making it difficult for us to breathe. Which one is correct? Why?
-
23$\begingroup$ TLDR: There is less air at higher altitudes. The air becomes less dense as you climb, but the percentage of oxygen in the air stays the same. $\endgroup$– Solomon SlowDec 20, 2021 at 13:36
-
3$\begingroup$ @SolomonSlow the percentage of oxygen goes down as soon as you leave the troposphere. $\endgroup$– fraxinusDec 20, 2021 at 19:23
-
2$\begingroup$ @fraxinus, The chart in J. Murray's answer seems to suggest that the composition of the atmosphere is approximately constant all the way out to the official "edge of space" (100km). But even if there is some small gradient in the percentage of oxygen in the stratosphere and mesosphere, I'm guessing that's beyond the realm that the OP was asking about—the realm in which "it becomes more and more difficult to breathe." By the time you're in the stratosphere, you've gone way past the point where the air is dense enough to sustain human life. $\endgroup$– Solomon SlowDec 20, 2021 at 20:58
-
1$\begingroup$ This image might help: imgur.com/dWyWsZy $\endgroup$– Nilay GhoshDec 21, 2021 at 5:29
-
$\begingroup$ See the link aviation.stackexchange.com/q/19486 It basically is saying the same thing as other answers but this time from the point of airplane engine. $\endgroup$– Orçun ÇolakDec 21, 2021 at 12:07
4 Answers
For elevations less than about 100 km (for reference, the peak of Mt. Everest is about 8.8 km above sea level), the relative concentration of oxygen in the air is fairly constant at about 21%.
It's true that there's less oxygen (more specifically,the partial pressure of oxygen is lower) with increasing altitude - and this is simply because there is less gas overall.
The reason it's difficult to breathe at higher altitudes is that the ability of your lungs to oxygenate your blood depends on the partial pressure of O$_2$ in your lungs when you take a breath. At sea level and under ordinary conditions, the partial pressure of O$_2$ in your lungs is approximately $21\% \times 100\ \mathrm{kPa} \approx 21\ \mathrm{kPa}$. This defines normal, at least in a limited sense. If you're breathing pure oxygen, then you could potentially have an O$_2$ partial pressure of $100\ \mathrm{kPa}$, which can help compensate for damage to the lungs (e.g. from scarring) which reduces their ability to oxygenate blood - though as user Arsenal points out in a comment, under ordinary circumstances this would induce hyperoxia, which is bad news.
On the other hand, at the top of Mt. Everest the partial pressure in your lungs would drop to approximately $21\% \times 30\ \mathrm{kPa} \approx 6\ \mathrm{kPa}$ - nowhere near enough to sustain for extended periods, especially under increased physical stress. Breathing pure oxygen from a tank boosts this number to closer to $30\ \mathrm{kPa}$, which is why most climbers take their own oxygen with them.
However, above an altitude of 12 km (roughly the altitude at which commercial airliners fly) the pressure drops below $20\ \mathrm{kPa}$, which means that even breathing pure oxygen won't give you the normal required partial pressure of O$_2$, and you will risk hypoxia. That is why planes which fly above this altitude have positive-pressure respirators for pilots in case of emergency. Rather than being simply a higher concentration of oxygen, the gas in a positive-pressure respirator is (as the name suggests) actively pressurized above the ambient atmospheric pressure to force the required amount of oxygen into your lungs. See e.g. page 4 of this booklet from the US FAA and the associated regulations.
-
$\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. $\endgroup$– SuperCiocia ♦Dec 22, 2021 at 16:18
Well, both are related. With lower pressure molecules tend to be less "packed" and so when you breathe you inhale less oxygen. Thus, the difficulty to breathe in really high altitude.
The amount of oxygen gets lower but not the concentration
The confusion in the question is based on a vague definition of "amount".
Most of the atmosphere below about 100km is well mixed (by the effect we call weather which ensures the relative proportion of gases in the atmosphere stays the same by turbulent mixing). Only in the rarefied higher atmosphere (10 times higher than Everest) do the effects of weather pter out and gravity can compete with diffusion causing some separation by the molecular mass of the gas.
But what does vary rapidly with height above sea level is the density of the atmosphere. At the top of Everest, the tallest mountain, the density of air is only about 1/3 of the value at sea-level. So there is only about a third as much of any component in the air. The proportion of oxygen is still about 21% but the amount of oxygen is only about 1/3 of the amount at sea level.
So any confusion arises because of the definition of "amount". If you mean the proportion of oxygen, it is the same as at sea level; but if you mean the absolute amount of oxygen, it is only ~30% of the value at sea-level. what matters for your ability to breathe is the total amount of oxygen per liter of air not the proportion of oxygen in each litre of air.
Some people refer to "amount" as the relative proportion, some as the total concentration. Hence the confusion.
Oxygen does get lower (in terms of percentage). It happens due density of oxygen. As we increase altitude relatively heavier gases stay down. Lower pressure rarely causes difficulty in breathing. It may cause nose bleeds or ailments related to high blood pressure. But due to less amount of oxygen we need to intake more amount of air which is seen as difficulty in breathing.
-
10$\begingroup$ Mixing in the lower atmosphere keeps the relative concentration of oxygen in the air fairly constant until you reach altitudes greater than about 100 km. It is precisely the lower pressure (not a decrease in the oxygen concentration) which causes hypoxia at higher altitudes - a condition called hypobaric hypoxia, as noted by the source to which you link. $\endgroup$ Dec 20, 2021 at 8:14
-
$\begingroup$ I would expect that the oxygen percentage remains similar but the amount of oxygen per volume drops, as stated in the previous comment. $\endgroup$– my2ctsDec 20, 2021 at 8:56
-
1$\begingroup$ Indeed the chart says "effective oxygen concentration". It seems they simulate the effect of barometric pressure by adjusting the O2 in an "air" at sea level. $\endgroup$ Dec 20, 2021 at 10:06