2
$\begingroup$

I'm taking the variation of the Gauss-Bonnet action $$\mathcal{L}_{GB} = \frac{1}{2}\left(R^{2} - 4R^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu} + R^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\right)$$ to obtain the equations of motion and the boundary terms. The Equations of motion (E.O.M.) I've end up with are those found in the literature $$\left[2(RR_{\mu\nu} - 2R^{\alpha\beta}R_{\mu\alpha\nu\beta} - 2R_{\mu}{}^{\alpha}R_{\nu\alpha} + R_{\mu\rho\alpha\beta}R_{\nu}{}^{\rho\alpha\beta}) - \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{GB}\right]\delta g^{\mu\nu}.$$ But I'm not sure how to deal with the remaining terms $$\left(Rg^{\mu\alpha}g^{\nu\beta} - 4R^{\nu\beta}g^{\mu\alpha} + R^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\right)\delta R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}.$$ My first tought was to make this a total derivative to make it a boundary term (which seems reasonable since I haven't found any article including them in the E.O.M.)... But I can't find a "Palatini Identity" for $\delta R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}$.

By this I mean that since $$ \delta R_{b c d}^{a}=\nabla_{c}\left(\delta \Gamma_{b d}^{a}\right)-\nabla_{d}\left(\delta \Gamma_{b c}^{a}\right) $$ $$\delta R_{b d}=\nabla_{a}\left(\delta \Gamma_{b d}^{a}\right)-\nabla_{d}\left(\delta \Gamma_{b a}^{a}\right)$$ there might be an equation like $$\delta R_{\rho\sigma\mu\nu} \overset{?}{=} \nabla_{\mu}\left(\delta\Gamma_{\rho\nu\sigma}\right) - \nabla_{\nu}\left(\delta\Gamma_{\rho\mu\sigma}\right).$$ But I haven't been able to derive such equation. Is there a type of "Palatini identity" for the purely covariant Riemann tensor or any expression that can help me make these terms a total derivative?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, the expression you're looking for is actually derived in a question & answer in one under the following link: physics.stackexchange.com/q/126046. In essence, you're getting an extra term apart from $\delta R^{a}_{bcd}$ because of the one-time-usage of the inverse metric, which also gets varied under $\delta$. $\endgroup$
    – K.T.
    Dec 8, 2021 at 16:47

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I was also struggling with this, you can have a look at this http://www.ugr.es/~bjanssen/text/Tesis-JoseAlbertoOrejuela.pdf

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review $\endgroup$
    – Miyase
    Apr 24, 2023 at 11:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.