This is a soft question I was discussing with a friend. Suppose a portal opens up (I know this is fiction) but for the sake of argument, let's suppose something like that happens. And the observer can watch "live streaming" to the other side of the portal to a planet really far away - maybe near a black hole.

Eistein's relativity suggests that different gravity fields impose difference in time. Suppose 1 minute in the planet of the observer is 10 minutes to the planet that the portal lets you look at. Would the observer see the people going in fast forward? Or in general, what would he see since the light passes in real time through the portal? Would he just look in the past?

Now a less fictional question similar to the above: Do points in space exist such that are so close (as in, just as close as the earth is to the moon) yet their gravitational fields or velocities are so much in difference that the difference in time can be observed in real time with your own telescope/eyes? Would you see people get old really fast? (Careful - I'm not talking about the time difference imposed by the the lag you get of the big distance the light has to travel). For example: maybe 2 close planets, one just after the event horizon of a black hole and one just outside (I know you can't get information from objects inside a black hole) but this was what came first to my mind as objects close but in different gravity fields.

I'm a mathematician so excuse me if I don't understand exactly how time dilation or general relativity work.

  • $\begingroup$ Is the portal necessary? Could we not use a telescope or something. The problem is that spacetimes with wormholes are much more complicated than realistic spacetimes. They usually involve negative energy densities and so forth. I am not sure time dilation is even well defined in such spacetimes. $\endgroup$
    – Dale
    Nov 22, 2021 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ I have no idea. My questions comes up to the single question. Is time dilation observable in real time? Like can an observer actually see a clock going faster or slower "next" to him cause of gravity or speed. Like watching someone actually aging in a matter of minutes? $\endgroup$
    – Jam
    Nov 22, 2021 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ Then I would recommend removing the portal thing. It is unnecessary and not helpful in trying to give a physically meaningful answer. You can just use telescopes for distant observers or ordinary vision for nearby observers. $\endgroup$
    – Dale
    Nov 22, 2021 at 15:04

1 Answer 1


Ignoring your first paragraph because magic portals are governed by the whim of fantasy authors, not the laws of physics.

Inertial (velocity-based, non-accelerating) time dilation goes as:

$\Delta t' = \gamma\Delta t = \frac{\Delta t}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}$

where $\Delta t'$ is the elapsed time measured by a clock in the observed frame and $\Delta t$ is the elapsed time in the observer frame, and $v$ is the velocity that the observer measures between itself and the observed frame.

Qualitatively: the shortest time between two events is always the time measured by the clock for which those events are in the same place, and an observer watching a moving clock always sees the clock advancing slower than the observer's clock.

Gravitational (accelerated frame) time dilation for a non-rotating sphere of mass $M$ goes as:

$\Delta t_f{\sqrt{1-v_e^2/c^2}} = \Delta t$

where $v_e = \sqrt{2GM/r}$, the escape velocity the observer would need to escape the gravity well

$\Delta t$ is the time measured by the observer

and $\Delta t_f$ is the time measured by an observer infinitely far from the massive sphere.

For a circular orbit, in the frame of the orbiting body,

$\Delta t_f{\sqrt{1-\frac {3 v_e^2}{2c^2}}} = \Delta t$

Qualitatively: the shortest time between two events is always measured by the clock whose own escape velocity is greatest, and an observer watching a clock with a lower escape velocity sees the clock advancing faster than the observer's clock, while an observer watching a clock with a higher escape velocity sees the clock advancing slower than the observer's clock.

Both these effects are measurable in everyday life in coordinating clock synchronization between orbiting satellites and ground-based human computers, which is especially important for GPS. The satellite has a relative velocity to the observer on Earth, so we measure its clock running slower. The satellite has a lower escape velocity than the observer on Earth, so we measure its clock running faster. Combining the two gives you the correct clock synchronization. Chart below (wikipedia).

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ So i would see someone aging really fast? Supposingly there are points in space so close with that much time dilation difference? $\endgroup$
    – Jam
    Nov 22, 2021 at 15:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jam It would be fatal to get close enough to a black hole to observe a thousand-to-one time dilation with the naked eye, but such points exist in the universe. The factor $v_e^2/c^2$ is identical to the factor $r_s/r$ for $r>r_s$ where $r_s$ is the schwarzchild radius of a black hole event horizon, so by positioning yourself arbitrarily close to the black hole you can set an arbitrarily high time dilation factor. They'd also be blueshifted well out of the visible field, so you couldn't actually see any of it - the photons are subject to time dilation, too. $\endgroup$
    – g s
    Nov 22, 2021 at 15:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.