0
$\begingroup$

I was wondering that many instruments that measure the ddp in a circuit works measuring instead current and then applying Ohm's law.

When I looked for how Ohm made his initial measurements for voltage, I found that he used a thermocouple, measuring the temperature.

But how was that thermocouple calibrated? Is there another instrument or something like this?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
0
$\begingroup$

I think you are asking how he knew how much is 1 ampere or 1 volt. He didn't know. Almost every unit was arbitrarily defined. So, something like, for 1 degree temperature difference, current meter gives x degree deflection. Let's call it 1 ampere. Standard definitions of the units came much much later.

So, in short, Ohm arbitrarily decided the calibration.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Ohm initially use cells (voltaic piles) but found them to provide a stable voltage and have variable internal resistances so he then used a two thermocouples as the source of voltage. He assumed that the voltage provided by thermocouples was proportional to the difference in the temperature of the junctions. So there was no reference made to measuring the voltage in volts rather he assumed that doubling the temperature doubled the voltage.

So in essence he was investigation whether

$\text{temperature difference} \,\,(\propto \rm voltage \propto current)\propto \text{gavanometer deflection}$

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Wait, what? Didn't he use the definition of the potential that was known( for a point charge)? Where is the link between this assumed voltage and the potential I just mentioned? $\endgroup$
    – forgetfuled
    Nov 18, 2021 at 12:57
  • $\begingroup$ What I am trying to point out is that Ohm did not need to use any definition of the volt and the ampere to show the proportionality. The part of my equation outside the brackets is what he showed experimentally and the part inside the brackets is what he inferred from his observations. $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    Nov 18, 2021 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so i'm asking, who verified the seebeck effect? And using which instruments? My doubts are about the link between what i know about potential in situation where we have a distribution of fixed charge and the potential in a circuit $\endgroup$
    – forgetfuled
    Nov 18, 2021 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest that you start another post and ask about the Seebeck effect. $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    Nov 18, 2021 at 17:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.