3
$\begingroup$

I am a bit confused by the way a Fock state is defined and hope to find some clarification.

The Fock space is defined as the direct sum of all $n$-particle Hilbertspaces $H_i$

$$F = H_0 \oplus H_1 \oplus H_2 \oplus ...$$

Let $|\Phi \rangle$ be a $m$-particle state. Obviously $|\Phi \rangle \in H_m$ is a true statement. However I am wondering wether $|\Phi \rangle$ itself is a Fock state

$$|\Phi \rangle \in F$$

or a state that looks like

$$|\Phi \rangle_F = 0 \oplus 0 \oplus ... \oplus |\Phi \rangle \oplus ... $$

$\endgroup$
9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I changed $\bigoplus$ to $\oplus$ because it improved formatting imo. If there is any significance to \bigoplus that I'm not aware of, feel free to change it back. $\endgroup$
    – jng224
    Nov 7, 2021 at 13:40
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Jonas \bigoplus is often used as the direct sum variant of the standard summation symbol (i.e. $\displaystyle \bigoplus_{n=0}^\infty H_n=H_0 \oplus H_1 \oplus \ldots$) so your edit is good. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Nov 7, 2021 at 13:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ the previous to last belong to hilbert space, the last one to focker space $\endgroup$
    – user65081
    Nov 7, 2021 at 13:53
  • $\begingroup$ The last equation doesn't make much sense to me. What do you mean with the direct sum of zeroes and a state $\vert \Phi\rangle$? $\endgroup$ Nov 7, 2021 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ The most general form of a Fock state is some vector like this: $| \Psi \rangle = |0\rangle \oplus \sum_i a_i | \phi_i \rangle \oplus \sum_{i,j} | a_{i,j} \phi_i, \phi_j \rangle \oplus ...$. The "direct sum of zeros" should emphazise, that all coefficients $a_i, a_{i,j} ,...$ are equal to zero except for the ones the state $| \Phi \rangle$ is made up. $\endgroup$
    – maxxam
    Nov 7, 2021 at 14:11

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The direct sum $\oplus$ maps a pair of Hilbert spaces to a larger Hilbert space. It doesn't directly act on individual states in the Hilbert space.

A generic Fock space state would look like \begin{equation} |\Psi \rangle = a_0|0 \rangle + \sum_i a_i |\phi_i\rangle + \sum_{ij} a_{ij} |\phi_i, \phi_j \rangle + \cdots \end{equation} where $|\phi_i \rangle$ are a basis for the one particle states.

You could write a generic $n$ particle state as \begin{equation} |\Psi \rangle = 0 |0\rangle + \sum_i 0 |\phi_i\rangle + \cdots + \sum_{i_1, \cdots, i_n} a_{i_1 \cdots i_n} |\phi_{i_1} \cdots \phi_{i_n}\rangle + \cdots \end{equation} But most people don't write terms that are identically zero unless they are making some kind of point. Therefore a more common way to write an $n$ particle state is simply \begin{equation} |\Psi \rangle = \sum_{i_1, \cdots, i_n} a_{i_1 \cdots i_n} |\phi_{i_1} \cdots \phi_{i_n}\rangle \end{equation}

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.