1
$\begingroup$

In the well-known resistor cube problem using a resistor cube with equivalent resistors on all the edges, the prescribed approach to solving it involves merging points of equivalent potential as shown below:

This is a shown on physicstasks.eu

While I can work through the logic superficially, I just can't make sense of it intuitively. Why is it that linking up points of equivalent potential doesn't change the resistance of the circuit, beyond the explanation always given that "current does not flow through the 'phantom' conductor connecting vertices of equal potential". What is the intuition for this solution to the resistor cube problem?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I am voting to reopen. This is a conceptual question about symmetry in circuits with just the homework question as background. Particularly since the OP asks for an intuitive explanation they are not seeking help for a specific calculation $\endgroup$
    – Dale
    Oct 25 '21 at 15:08
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ How on earth has this been closed. This is not homework of any sort- it’s a conceptual question to which I would quite like to get an answer! $\endgroup$
    – P0W8J6
    Oct 25 '21 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ More on symmetry in a resistor circuit. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Oct 25 '21 at 18:14
1
$\begingroup$

There is no intuition other than that no current flows across two points at the same electrical potential. When two or more resistors have the a common node (endpoint) and are identical, the potential drop across them is the same, even if their other nodes are not physically connected. This is functionally equivalent to saying the resistors are in parallel and is essentially what the solution you have quoted is explaining.

Using this approach, the three edges of the resistor cube with the common node H are in parallel, which you can consider group A. This group has the equivalent resistance of $R_A = R/3$, assuming each cube-edge has resistance $R$. Symmetrically, the three resistors at the opposite end with the common node B are also mutually parallel. That is another group, B, again with overall resistance $R_B = R/3$. The slightly tricky one is the remaining group of six resistors. For each of them, if you consider their endpoints which are closer to H, you will notice they are actually at the same potential, since the current through each of them previously had to pass through exactly one identical resistor. The same argument applies to their other nodes (closer to B) -- they are also at the same potential. In other words, the remaining group of six resistors are also mutually parallel -- call it C. This group has the equivalent resistance of $R_C = R/6$.

In summary, you have three groups of mutually parallel resistors which are group-wise in series with each other. Hence, the total resistance is simply the sum: $$R_T = R_A + R_B + R_C = \frac{R}{3} + \frac{R}{3} + \frac{R}{6} = \frac{5R}{6}.$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the response. So, to clarify, it would be accurate to conclude that any number of resistors in a circuit which have the same current through them (by symmetry) and the same resistance are functionally parallel to each other, regardless of their position in the circuit? $\endgroup$
    – P0W8J6
    Oct 26 '21 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ @P0W8J6 You need to be careful. This only works if the two ends of all the resistors are respectively at the same potential. For example, if $a_1, b_1$ are the ends of one resistor and $a_2, b_2$ are the ends of another resistor, they are in parallel if and only if $V(a_1) = V(a_2)$, and $V(a_1) = V(a_2)$. $\endgroup$
    – Yejus
    Oct 27 '21 at 8:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.