2
$\begingroup$

lately I have come across the hydrogen line spectrum, I quite understand it as I could easily solve all numerical questions. However, conceptually I feel stuck at two points.

  1. If an electron absorbs the em radiation of a particular wavelength to jump to a higher shell say $n=1$ to $n=3$, then when it returns to the ground state (from $n=3$ to $n=1$) will it emit the radiation of the same wavelength or of a different wavelength. Kindly explain what exactly happens?

  2. In the absorption spectrum of hydrogen, em wavelengths of 434 nm, 486 nm, and 656 nm are absorbed because they correspond to the energy difference between the shells so they are not present on the photographic plate but I don't understand that if excited electrons (from the absorbed light) jump back to their ground state in nanoseconds releasing the same radiation with the same wavelength then why does it not appear in the spectrum? Also, how do the electrons figure out which light to be absorbed (I know it sounds dumb but I just can't understand how do electrons figure out that a particular wavelength does not suffice the energy requirement to jump?)

P.S.: Please consider my doubt and excuse it if they appear dumb as I have taken these questions to various platforms and have never received any satisfactory response.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hello! Please only ask one question per post – otherwise it might get closed due to lack of focus. You can always edit your question or ask a new one. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – jng224
    Commented Oct 16, 2021 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ Okay sure . since I am new here I didn't know this. But definitely, I'll take care of this. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 18, 2021 at 8:06
  • $\begingroup$ I have rolled back the edit you made. You did the correct thing in reducing the number of questions in the post. Unfortunately, there are already answers present that still answered the previous version with the multiple questions, so removing these questions from the post makes those answers confusing to future readers. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 22, 2021 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ Of possible interest and relevance: physics.stackexchange.com/a/768678/313612. The electrically energized tube has both hydrogen molecules and hydrogen atoms that came from hydrogen molecules that were dissociated, i.e., broken into atoms. Some of the atoms are excited and de-excite by emitting the characteristic hydrogen atomic emission lines, e.g., the Balmer series that I show. And likewise, some excited hydrogen molecules emit light, e.g., the Fulcher alpha bands. $\endgroup$
    – Ed V
    Commented Jul 20, 2023 at 13:06

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

1.) An electron falling down from level n=3 can decay into the ground state in two ways, either directly into the ground state n=1, or first into n=2 and then into n=1. These decay paths have certain statistical probabilities, so from many atoms you will see three lines in this case with a relative intensity given by these probabilities.

2.) The absorption lines in a spectrum are caused by the fact that a beam of light travelling in a given direction will be re-emitted again in all directions, so light is lost from the beam and re-appears in other directions instead. See the following graphic for an illustration

absorption lines

from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/astronomy/chapter/formation-of-spectral-lines/)

Classically, you can explain the physical mechanism here by a forced harmonic oscillator. Light will only be absorbed by the atom at the resonant frequencies, which correspond to the spectral lines.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks@Thomas for the answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20, 2021 at 7:57
1
$\begingroup$

An excited hydrogen atom in its $n=3$ state might relax directly to the $n=1$ ground state. But it might also go through a “cascade,” emitting two lower-energy photons and passing through the intermediate state with $n=2$. The probability of a direct decay versus a cascade is independent of how it got to $n=3$: all states with the same quantum numbers are indistinguishable.

Also because of indistinguishablity, the emitted photons are almost certainly traveling in a different direction than the absorbed photons. So if you shine a white light through a hydrogen cloud, the transmitted light will be missing the characteristic colors associated with hydrogen transitions — but if you look at the cloud from the side, it’ll be glowing in those colors. In astronomy, this is the difference between an “absorption nebula” and an “emission nebula”: they’re made of exactly the same stuff, but we view them from different angles.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ thanks@rob for the answer. Just for clarification, will the absorbed and emitted photon from the hydrogen cloud be of the same wavelength/frequency?( I think they should be, but If I am wrong please correct $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 18, 2021 at 8:31
  • $\begingroup$ There is a tiny correction to the photon energy because the hydrogen atom must recoil to conserve momentum. The scale of the correction for atomic hydrogen is $E_\gamma/mc^2\sim10^{-8}$, but this correction becomes significant for higher-energy gamma rays interacting with a nucleus. To say that the absorbed and emitted energies are “exactly” the same is a very good approximation. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Oct 18, 2021 at 13:05
  • $\begingroup$ Thank You So Much @rob for answering. I am very clear with these concepts now. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20, 2021 at 7:56

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.