5
$\begingroup$

I have seen the following operator somewhere in a paper on cosmology $$ \frac{\partial_i \partial_j}{\nabla^2} - \frac{1}{3} \delta_{ij}. $$ What is the definition of the inverse Laplacian? What is meant by this misleading notation? Is this the inverse Laplacian? If yes, what is then $\frac{1}{\nabla^2}$?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

11
$\begingroup$

Let's write an arbitrary function $f:\,\Bbb R^3\mapsto\Bbb R$ as a Fourier transform:$$f(\vec{r})=(2\pi)^{-3/2}\int_{\Bbb R^3}\tilde{f}(\vec{k})e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}d^3\vec{k},\,f(\vec{k}):=(2\pi)^{-3/2}\int_{\Bbb R^3}f(\vec{r})e^{-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}d^3\vec{r}.$$(I've restricted to a $3$-dimensional space because I'm confident that's why $\frac13$ comes up in the expression you encountered.) The most obvious definition of $\frac{1}{\nabla^2}f$ is$$\frac{1}{\nabla^2}f:=(2\pi)^{-3/2}\int_{\Bbb R^n}\frac{\tilde{f}(\vec{k})}{-k^2}e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}d^3\vec{k}=(2\pi)^{-3}\int_{(\Bbb R^3)^2}\frac{f(\vec{R})e^{i\vec{k}\cdot(\vec{r}-\vec{R})}}{-k^2}d^3\vec{k}d^3\vec{R}.$$This coincides with @Vincent's definition of $(\nabla^2)^{-1}$ provided$$(2\pi)^{-3}\int_{\Bbb R^3}\frac{e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{z}}}{k^2+m^2}d^3\vec{k}=\frac{e^{-mz}}{4\pi z}$$is taken as $m\to0^+$ (strictly speaking, this is a distributional limit). By Fourier inversion, this conjecture is equivalent to$$\int_{\Bbb R^3}\frac{e^{-mz-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{z}}d^3\vec{z}}{4\pi z}=\frac{1}{k^2+m^2}.$$Indeed, spherical polars rewrite the LHS as$$\begin{align}\frac12\int_0^\pi d\theta\sin\theta\int_0^\infty ze^{-(m+ik\cos\theta)z}dz&=\frac12\int_0^\pi\frac{\sin\theta}{(m+ik\cos\theta)^2}d\theta\\&=\frac{1}{2ik}\left[\frac{1}{m+ik\cos\theta}\right]_0^\pi\\&=\frac{1}{k^2+m^2}.\end{align}$$This is quite a complicated manipulation, so it pays to use dimensional analysis as a power-counting sanity check.

$\endgroup$
0
11
$\begingroup$

Every Laplacian can be inverted using its Green's function. If we have $$\nabla^2V = \rho$$ the inverse is simply $$V(x) = \left(\nabla^2\right)^{-1} (\rho) = -\frac{1}{4\pi}\int \frac{\rho(x')}{|x-x'|} \text{d}^3x'$$ and that's what's meant by $\frac{1}{\nabla^2}$, at least in the places where I've seen it.

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ If we define $\Delta:=\nabla^2$, then what is $\Delta^{-1}$? I would say this is what you have defined and not $\frac{1}{\nabla^2}$. Isn't it? $\endgroup$
    – Immanuel
    Oct 5, 2021 at 15:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Immanuel See the last line in my answer above. In all the papers I've seen, $\frac{1}{\nabla^2}$ means $\Delta^{-1}$. $\endgroup$ Oct 5, 2021 at 15:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Immanuel Well $\sin^2 x$ does not mean $\sin(\sin(x))$ either $\endgroup$ Oct 5, 2021 at 15:45
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Immanuel I won't inveigh on the "should operators' inverses be denoted as reciprocals?" debate, but you might find this an interesting context where notational questions like that are important. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Oct 5, 2021 at 16:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Immanuel I'm working on an edit to show they are. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Oct 5, 2021 at 16:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.