2
$\begingroup$

Is there a simple way to reverse the Snell's-Equation-in-Vector-Form problem? I.e., given the incident and transmitted vectors $\,\mathbf{i}\,$ and $\,\mathbf{t}\,$ (both with norm = 1), find the normal vector of the boundary surface (between media with refr. indices n1 and n2, resp.) required to achieve the desired change of direction through refraction? I haven't found a simple solution, yet, after trying for an hour and a half. (I get a messy system of coupled non-linear equations.) The "forward" problem is discussed and solved here: Snell's law in vector form

This could be useful for finding and orienting a prism to bend a given ray into a desired direction.

$\endgroup$
2
2
$\begingroup$

I think I found the answer: Since Snell's law can be written as

\begin{equation} \left(\mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{\times}\mathbf{t}\right)=\mu\left(\mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{\times}\mathbf{i}\right) \tag{01}\label{01} \end{equation}

this implies that

\begin{equation} \mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{\times}\left(\mathbf{t}\boldsymbol{-}\mu\mathbf{i}\right)\boldsymbol{=0} \tag{02}\label{02} \end{equation}

which means $\,\mathbf{n}\,$ and $\,\left(\mathbf{t}\boldsymbol{-}\mu\mathbf{i}\right)\,$ must be parallel to each other (as neither will have length zero).

Therefore the desired normal vector $\,\mathbf{n}\,$ is given by \begin{equation} \mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{=}\dfrac{\mathbf{t}\boldsymbol{-}\mu\mathbf{i}}{\Vert\mathbf{t}\boldsymbol{-}\mu\mathbf{i}\Vert} \tag{03}\label{03} \end{equation}

Make sure that the dot product of $\,\mathbf{i}\,$ and $\,\mathbf{n}\,$ is positive, or you are violating the geometrical assumptions, see Figure below.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to PSE. Well done, PeterBaumgart, it was so simple. $\endgroup$
    – Frobenius
    Sep 25 '21 at 7:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.