1
$\begingroup$

I'm considering the following free Lagrangian (density):

$$\mathcal{L}= \bar{\Psi} \left(i \displaystyle{\not}{\partial}\mathbb{1}_{2}\right)\Psi$$

Where $\Psi$ is a doublet of two fermion fields $\Psi = \begin{pmatrix}\psi_{1}\\\psi_{2}\end{pmatrix}$.

This Lagrangian is obviously invariant under $U(2)$ transformations:

$\Psi \rightarrow U \Psi$, such that $U^{\dagger} U=\mathbb{1}_{2}$,

Using the Pauli matrices as the generators of the $U(2)=SU(2)\times U(1)$ group we can write:

$$U=e^{-i \left(\theta^{0}\mathbb{1}_2+\theta^{1}\sigma_{1}+\theta^{2}\sigma_{2}+\theta^{3}\sigma_{3}\right)}$$

In all the book I have read they stops here with the symmetries of the lagrangian, the problem is that in my opinion there is an additional symmetry:

$$\Psi \rightarrow e^{-i \gamma^{5} (q_{1}\mathbb{1}_{5}+q_{2}\sigma_{1})} \Psi = \begin{pmatrix}e^{-i \gamma^{5} (q_{1}+q_{2})}\psi_{1}\\e^{-i \gamma^{5} (q_{1}-q_{2})}\psi_{2}\end{pmatrix}$$

That corresponds to the chiral (axial) symmetries for each $\psi_{k}$, and so the symmetry group should be $[U(2)]\otimes [U_A(1)]_{q_1+q_2}\otimes [U_A(1)]_{q_1-q_2}$.

This symmetry can't be obtained from the one above because the coefficients $\theta^{i}$ are not numbers anymore but rather 4x4 matrices $(\gamma^{5})$.

Is this right or am I missing something?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The full symmetry group of the massless Lagrangian is actually: $$ SU(2)_L\times U_L(1)\times SU(2)_R\times U_R(1) $$ which covers the additional symmetries you noticed.

It can be rearranged as: $$ SU(2)_V\times U_V(1)\times SU(2)_A\times U_A(1) $$ where $$ U_A(1) $$ (related to your $q_1$ portion) is usually broken by the quantum anomaly, and $$ SU_A(2) $$ (related to your $q_2$ portion) might be dynamically violated by chiral symmetry breaking, depending on the circumstances (e.g. via QCD or NJL interactions).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.