4
$\begingroup$

I am following Padmanabhan's book Gravitation for the particular derivation. The derivation goes as follows, \begin{align} R_{abst}n^t&=\nabla_a\nabla_b n_s-\nabla_b\nabla_a n_s=\nabla_a(-K_{bs}-n_b a_s)-\nabla_b(-K_{as}-n_a a_s)\nonumber\\ &=-\nabla_a K_{bs}-n_b\nabla_a a_s-a_s\nabla_a n_b+\nabla_b K_{as}+n_a \nabla_b a_s+a_s\nabla_b n_a \end{align} Contracting again with a normal vector, \begin{align} R_{abst}n^b n^t &=-n^b \nabla_a K_{bs}+\nabla_a a_s+n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+n_a n^b \nabla_b a_s+a_s n^b\nabla_b n_a\nonumber\\ &=-n^b \nabla_a K_{bs}+(\delta^r_a+n_an^r)\nabla_r a_s+n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+a_s n^b\nabla_b n_a\nonumber\\ &=-n^b \nabla_a K_{bs}+h^r_a \nabla_r a_s+n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+a_s a_a \end{align} Now we project the free indices onto $\Sigma(t)$, \begin{align} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=-n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_a K_{bs}+D_m a_n+n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_b K_{as}+a_m a_n \end{align} Here we have used the fact that $n_a a^a=0\implies h^a_b a_a=a_b$. Moreover, from $K_{ab}n^b=0$ we have, $n^b\nabla_m K_{ab}=-K_{ab}\nabla_m n^b$, thus we have, \begin{align} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=K_{bn} h^a_m \nabla_a n^b+D_m a_n+n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_b K_{as}+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_b K_{as}+a_m a_n\nonumber \end{align} Now, \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as}=n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+K_{al}\nabla_s n^l+K_{ls}\nabla_a n^l. \end{align} \begin{align}\label{eq:curavaturetwonormal} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=K_{bn} h^a_m \nabla_a n^b+D_m a_n+n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_b K_{as}+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as}-K_{al}\nabla_s n^l-K_{ls}\nabla_a n^l)+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as})-K_{ml} h^s_n\nabla_s n^l-K_{ln}h^a_m \nabla_a n^l+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as})+K_{ml} K^l_n+K_{nl}K^l_m+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as})+2K_{bn}K^b_m+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as})+a_m a_n \end{align} The extrinsic curvature is defined as $-K_{mn}=h^a_m\nabla_an_n$. \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}&=\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}(h^a_m h^a_n K_{as})\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} K_{as})+h^a_m K_{as} (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} h^s_n)+h^s_n K_{as} (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}h^a_m)\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} K_{as})-2h^a_m K_{as} K^s_n-2h^s_n K_{as} K^a_m\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} K_{as})-4 K_{nb} K^b_m \end{align} Thus, we have, \begin{align} h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} K_{as})=\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}+4 K_{nb} K^b_m \end{align} Putting this into the original equation, we obtain, \begin{align} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=5K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}+a_m a_n \end{align} Which doesn't seem right.

In the book, however, we have something like this enter image description here

Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong and how to obtain the correct results?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Up until the sentence The extrinsic curvature is defined as..." everything is certainly good, compare e.g with eq. (3.43). in 3+1 formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity by ́Eric Gourgoulhon. There the terms with the 4-acceleration are expressed slightly different, using the relation $a_{\mu}=D_{\mu}\ln N$. $\endgroup$
    – K.T.
    Sep 15, 2021 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ @K.T. Thanks for checking. Then probably the relation $h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} K_{as})=\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}+4 K_{nb} K^b_m$ is wrong! But I don't understand why. $\endgroup$ Sep 15, 2021 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ Also, as for the differently expressed term with the Lie derivative, it can be similarly proven that $\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{m}}K_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{N}\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{\mu\nu}$, where $\mathbf{m}=N\mathbf{n}$ in a derivation very similar to (3.25) and using the fact that the extrinsic curvature (projected on the hypersurface) is a spatial tensor. Do you use different indices for making a distinction between the tensor field as living on the entire manifold versus its spatial projection? $\endgroup$
    – K.T.
    Sep 15, 2021 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ Professor T. Padmanabhan author of the book Gravitation: Foundations and Frontiers has unfortunately passed away on 17th September 2021. $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2021 at 14:56

1 Answer 1

4
+100
$\begingroup$

Try this following sequence of derivation instead.

\begin{align} R_{abst}n^t&=\nabla_a\nabla_b n_s-\nabla_b\nabla_a n_s=\nabla_a(-K_{bs}-n_b a_s)-\nabla_b(-K_{as}-n_a a_s)\nonumber\\ &=-\nabla_a K_{bs}-n_b\nabla_a a_s-a_s\nabla_a n_b+\nabla_b K_{as}+n_a \nabla_b a_s+a_s\nabla_b n_a \end{align} Contracting with a normal vector, \begin{align} R_{abst}n^b n^t &=-n^b \nabla_a K_{bs}+\nabla_a a_s+n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+n_a n^b \nabla_b a_s+a_s n^b\nabla_b n_a\nonumber\\ &=-n^b \nabla_a K_{bs}+(\delta^r_a+n_an^r)\nabla_r a_s+n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+a_s n^b\nabla_b n_a\nonumber\\ &=-n^b \nabla_a K_{bs}+h^r_a \nabla_r a_s+n^b \nabla_b K_{as}+a_s a_a \end{align} Projecting onto the hypersurface,

\begin{align} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=-n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_a K_{bs}+D_m a_n+n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_b K_{as}+a_m a_n \end{align} Using the fact, $n_a a^a=0\implies h^a_b a_a=a_b$. Moreover, $K_{ab}n^b=0\implies n^b\nabla_m K_{ab}=-K_{ab}\nabla_m n^b$, gives, \begin{align} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=K_{bn} h^a_m \nabla_a n^b+D_m a_n+n^b h^a_m h^s_n \nabla_b K_{as}+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (n^b\nabla_b K_{as})+a_m a_n \end{align} Now, \begin{align} h^a_m h^s_n\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{as}&=h^a_m h^s_n\left(n^b\nabla_b K_{as}+K_{bs}\nabla_a n^b+K_{ab}\nabla_s n^b\right)\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n\left(n^b\nabla_b K_{as}\right)-K_{bn}K_m^b-K_{mb}K^b_n \end{align} Also, \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}h^a_b&=\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}\left(\delta^a_b+n^a n_b\right)\nonumber\\ &=\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}\delta^a_b+\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}(n^a n_b)\nonumber\\ &=n^m\nabla_m \delta^a_b-\delta^m_b\nabla_m n^a+\delta^a_m\nabla_b n^m+n^m\nabla_m(n^a n_b)-n^m n_b\nabla_m n^a+n^a n_m\nabla_b n^m\nonumber\\ &=n^m n^a\nabla_m n_b\nonumber\\ &=n^a a_b \end{align} Then, \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}&=\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}(h^a_m h^s_n K_{as})\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} K_{as})+h^a_m K_{as} (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}} h^s_n)+h^s_n K_{as} (\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}h^a_m)\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n\left(n^b\nabla_b K_{as}\right)-K_{bn}K_m^b-K_{mb}K^b_n-h^a_m K_{as} n^s a_n-h^s_n K_{as} n^a a_m\nonumber\\ &=h^a_m h^s_n\left(n^b\nabla_b K_{as}\right)-K_{bn}K_m^b-K_{mb}K^b_n\nonumber \end{align} Putting all these together, we have, \begin{align} R_{abst}h^a_m n^b h^s_n n^t &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ h^a_m h^s_n (n^b\nabla_b K_{as})+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=-K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ \mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}+2K_{bn}K^b_m+a_m a_n\nonumber\\ &=K_{bn} K^b_m+D_m a_n+ \mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{n}}K_{mn}+a_m a_n\nonumber \end{align} This is the desired expression.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.