0
$\begingroup$

[EDITED QUESTION] We have a vector of bosonic operators, such that: \begin{equation*} \vec{\phi} = (a, b, c)^{\text{T}} \; , \end{equation*} and the following commutation rules, \begin{equation*} \begin{split} [A_{\ell}, A_{\ell^{'}}] &=0 \\ [A^{\dagger}_{\ell}, A^{\dagger}_{\ell^{'}}] &=0 \\ [A_{\ell}, A^{\dagger}_{\ell^{'}}] &=\delta_{\ell,\ell^{'}} \; , \end{split} \end{equation*} for each operator, where $A_{\ell} = a,b,c$.

If now we applied a rotation to the vector, such that: \begin{equation*} \vec{\phi^{'}} = R^{-1}\vec{\phi} \; , \end{equation*} where:

$R = \frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 1 & \sqrt{2} \\ \sqrt{2} & \sqrt{2} & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & -\sqrt{2} \end{bmatrix}$ and $R^{-1} = \frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix} -1 & \sqrt{2} & -1 \\ 1 & \sqrt{2} & 1 \\ \sqrt{2} & 0 & -\sqrt{2} \end{bmatrix} = R^{\dagger} \; ,$

[EDIT: the matrix $R$ had a typo and wasn't unitary. Where it reads $1/2$, it was $1/\sqrt{2}$.]

are the new operators also bosonic? Is this type of linear combination of bosonic operators also a bosonic operator?

[EDIT. Answer: Now that the matrix is unitary, the linear combination of the bosonics operators are also bosonic operators.]

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You wrote down the conditions for operators to be bosonic. Did you try to straightforwardly check if your new operators fulfil those conditions? $\endgroup$
    – noah
    Sep 10 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ What is the connection between the ${\boldsymbol \phi}$ and the $A$'s? And why write the inverse of the orthogonal matrix $Ri$ n such a strange way? It's just the transpose of $R$ surely? $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Sep 10 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ The vector $\phi$ is formed by three bosonic operators $a$, $b$ and $c$. They follow these three conditions, where $Aℓ=a,b,c$. The matrix $R$ was given like that, so the operation $RR^{\dagger}=2\mathbb{I}$, that might be the source of the issue here. Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – koy
    Sep 10 at 20:21
1
$\begingroup$

As you have written it, $R$ is not unitary nor orthogonal, as $$RR^\dagger=R^\dagger R=2\mathbb{I}.$$ Using the proper normalization for $R$ (with $1/2$ out front instead of $1/\sqrt{2}$) will ensure that it is unitary and thus that the resulting operators will also satisfy bosonic commutation relations.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Apparently the question provides an incorrect rotation matrix. I was thinking that something else would be needed if that wasn't the issue. Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – koy
    Sep 10 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ @yko awesome, glad to help! $\endgroup$ Sep 10 at 20:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.