According to this paper, the graph explaining Hubble's law is expressed in two cases. The first is when the hubble parameter is constant over time, and the second is when it changes over time.
My question is as follows. First: I understand that the reason the Hubble graph is straight is that the distance to the measurement object is close, for example, when you write a graph, it becomes straight only if the distance is very close. Why does the change in Hubble constant over time make a straight line into a curve? Is the explanation of the paper wrong?
Second: as far as I know, the Hubble constant in the graph above means the Hubble constant value at the time of writing the graph, but the Hubble constant in different time cannot be expressed on the same curve. I understand that if you want to find the value of the Hubble constant in the past, you have to draw another graph.
So, is the following sentence in the paper wrong?
“ As one moves from right to left in Fig. 6 (i.e., from the past toward the present), the slope, and hence the expansion rate, increases.”
Although distant celestial bodies represent past information, I don't think it's right to express the change in Hubble parameters in the current graph.