Say I have a pot of water that boils in 20 minutes, at whatever temperature.

If I leave the fire on, take the pot off, pour the hot water into a container, refill the pot with tap water and put it back on the fire.

How long will the 2nd pot take to boil and why?


1 Answer 1


Assuming the first was also tap water at the same temp and the pot was room temperature, then all that can be said given your question is "less than 20 minutes". It depends on the thermal capacity of the pot.

Put another way, the first time you boil the water you have to do two things:

  • Heat the pot to boiling temp
  • Heat the water to boiling temp

The second time all you have to do is:

  • Heat the water to boiling temp

What really happens when you put the tap water in the hot pot for the second time is that thermal energy from the pot flows into the cooler water and warms it up. This lowers the temperature of the pot and raises the temp of the water until they are roughly equal temperatures (thermal equilibrium). After this balancing the whole system starts out warmer than the first system did and less energy must be put into the system to heat it to the same boiling point. If the first one took 20 minutes then the second one will take less time. The actual amount of time saved depends on how much heat energy was stored in the pot and that depends on the size of the pot, what it's made out of, etc.

  • $\begingroup$ Yeah. I don't think there could be any other catch in the question $\endgroup$
    – Man
    Commented May 29, 2013 at 2:45
  • $\begingroup$ Nope...no catch. This is exactly the explanation I was looking for. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2013 at 2:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The only thing I would add is that the water probably has a much higher heat capacity, being both more massive and having a specific heat capacity about four times as large. Therefore the time will probably not change by much. $\endgroup$
    – user10851
    Commented May 29, 2013 at 3:53
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisWhite agreed, the difference is likely to be small. $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2013 at 3:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.