Equation of capacitance of a capacitor Imagine the two terminal of a parallel-plate capacitor are connected to the two terminal of a battery with electric potential difference $V$. If the capacitance of the capacitor is $C$, and the area of each plate is $A$, then how can I express the charge stored on each plate ($\pm Q$) in terms of only $C$, $V$ and $A$?
My Attempt:
We know that the voltage across the capacitor is $V=\frac{Qd}{\epsilon A}$, where $d$ is the distance between the plates (since there is only one capacitor connected to the battery of electric potential $V$), and the capacitance is $C=\frac{\epsilon A}{d}$. We can rearrange this to get $d=\frac{\epsilon A}{C}$; then plugging it to the first equation we get: $V=\frac{Q}{\epsilon A}\cdot \frac{\epsilon A}{C}= \frac{Q}{C}$, so thatthe stored charge is $Q=CV$. Unfortunately, this is the elementary formula that relates only $C$ and $V$ to $Q$, but not the area $A$ of the plates.
I need a formula that relates  $C$, $V$, and $A$ to $Q$.
 A: The answer is $$Q(C,V,A)=CV,$$ which is why you're having trouble.
This is like the equation for a horizontal line: $$y=f(x)=2$$
Has no $x$ in the equation.
A: The individual quantities in $\frac d {\epsilon A}$ can freely vary as long as the overall quantity stays the same. For instance, if you double both the distance and the area, then  $\frac d {\epsilon A}$ remains constant, and thus $Q$, $V$, and $C$ can remain constant. This shows that you can have two different capacitors with the same $Q,V,C$ but different $A$.

the stored charge is Q=CV. Unfortunately, this is the elementary formula that relates only C and V to Q, but not the area A of the plates.

But it does relate $Q$ to $C,V,A$. You can rewrite it $Q^1=C^1V^1A^0$ if you want. If you were doing a log-log linear regression on $\log Q = \beta_1\log C+\beta_2\log V+\beta_3
\log A$, you would find that $\beta_3=0$. That's the value of $\beta$. No further rearranging of terms is going to get a different $\beta$. That is the one correct answer. The effect size of $A$ on $Q$, after controlling for $C$ and $V$, is zero.
A: You have the formula in the question:  $Q=CV$ (which holds for any capacitor, not just one with a parallel plate).  There is no way to include any additional dependence on the plates' area $A$, because once you know $C$, and $V$, $Q$ is already completely determined.  So, when written as a function of $C$, $V$, and $A$, the dependence of $Q(C,V,A)=CV$ on $A$ is trivial.
